Work and vis-viva     

De Volson Wood 《Journal of The Franklin Institute》1865,79(1):27-30

  相似文献   

Schooling in a Democracy: Transformation or Reproduction?*     

George H. Wood 《Educational theory》1984,34(3):219-239

  相似文献   

The Complete Guide to Medical Writing     

Elizabeth H. Wood 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2008,96(1):70-71

  相似文献   

Sharing in the classroom          下载免费PDF全文

Wood WB 《CBE life sciences education》2008,7(3):263-264

  相似文献   

Promoting an awareness of retractions: the Louisiana State University Medical Center in Shreveport experience     

Duggar DC  Christopher KA  Tucker BE  Jones DA  Watson M  Puckett M  Wood B 《Medical reference services quarterly》1995,14(1):17-32

The current mission statement of the Medical Library Association states that it is "dedicated to improving health through professional excellence and leadership of its members in the ... provision of information services and educational programs ..." With this goal in mind, retractions offer medical librarians a professional challenge to become involved in the scientific process. Through results of a survey conducted among the consortium of South Central Academic Medical Libraries (SCAMeL), this paper reveals opinions on the importance of retraction awareness and who is responsible for disseminating this knowledge. The paper also reports what the Louisiana State University Medical Center at Shreveport Library and other SCAMeL member libraries are doing to promote awareness.  相似文献   

Taking the plunge into the gene pool: Teaching and learning in genetics     

Rachel Wood 《Research in Science Education》1993,23(1):337-344

Genetics is an area of science that causes problems for children. This paper reviews initial findings from research into children's views of how inheritance works and the role this plays in their overall view of genetics. The implications these results have for the traditional approach to genetics education are outlined. An alternative approach is proposed. Specializations: teacher development, science and technology curriculum development.  相似文献   

Developing Librarian Competencies for the Digital Age,edited by Jeffrey G. Coghill and Roger G. Russell     

Jamie L. Conklin 《Medical reference services quarterly》2017,36(3):307-308

  相似文献   

The effectiveness of machine score-ability ratings in predicting automated scoring performance     

Susan Lottridge  Scott Wood  Dan Shaw 《教育实用测度》2018,31(3):215-232

ABSTRACT

This study sought to provide a framework for evaluating machine score-ability of items using a new score-ability rating scale, and to determine the extent to which ratings were predictive of observed automated scoring performance. The study listed and described a set of factors that are thought to influence machine score-ability; these factors informed the score-ability rating applied by expert raters. Five Reading items, six Science items, and 10 Math items were examined. Experts in automated scoring served as reviewers, providing independent ratings of score-ability before engine calibration. Following the rating, engines were calibrated and their performances were evaluated using common industry criteria. Three derived criteria from the engine evaluations were computed: the score-ability value in the rating scale based on the empirical results, the number of industry evaluation criteria met by the engine, the approval status of the engine based on the number of criteria met. The results indicated that the score-ability ratings were moderately correlated with Science score-ability, the ratings were weakly correlated with Math score-ability, and were not correlated with Reading score-ability.  相似文献   

Development of SDI services from a manual current awareness service to SDILINE     

M S Wood  R S Seeds 《Bulletin of the Medical Library Association》1974,62(4):374-384

  相似文献   

Hidden in the Middle: Culture,Value and Reward in Bioinformatics     

Jamie Lewis  Andrew Bartlett  Paul Atkinson 《Minerva》2016,54(4):471-490

Bioinformatics – the so-called shotgun marriage between biology and computer science – is an interdiscipline. Despite interdisciplinarity being seen as a virtue, for having the capacity to solve complex problems and foster innovation, it has the potential to place projects and people in anomalous categories. For example, valorised ‘outputs’ in academia are often defined and rewarded by discipline. Bioinformatics, as an interdisciplinary bricolage, incorporates experts from various disciplinary cultures with their own distinct ways of working. Perceived problems of interdisciplinarity include difficulties of making explicit knowledge that is practical, theoretical, or cognitive. But successful interdisciplinary research also depends on an understanding of disciplinary cultures and value systems, often only tacitly understood by members of the communities in question. In bioinformatics, the ‘parent’ disciplines have different value systems; for example, what is considered worthwhile research by computer scientists can be thought of as trivial by biologists, and vice versa. This paper concentrates on the problems of reward and recognition described by scientists working in academic bioinformatics in the United Kingdom. We highlight problems that are a consequence of its cross-cultural make-up, recognising that the mismatches in knowledge in this borderland take place not just at the level of the practical, theoretical, or epistemological, but also at the cultural level too. The trend in big, interdisciplinary science is towards multiple authors on a single paper; in bioinformatics this has created hybrid or fractional scientists who find they are being positioned not just in-between established disciplines but also in-between as middle authors or, worse still, left off papers altogether.  相似文献