全文获取类型
| 收费全文 | 422篇 |
| 免费 | 15篇 |
专业分类
| 教育 | 357篇 |
| 科学研究 | 8篇 |
| 各国文化 | 7篇 |
| 体育 | 32篇 |
| 文化理论 | 4篇 |
| 信息传播 | 29篇 |
出版年
| 2023年 | 5篇 |
| 2022年 | 8篇 |
| 2021年 | 12篇 |
| 2020年 | 15篇 |
| 2019年 | 36篇 |
| 2018年 | 24篇 |
| 2017年 | 32篇 |
| 2016年 | 24篇 |
| 2015年 | 19篇 |
| 2014年 | 18篇 |
| 2013年 | 70篇 |
| 2012年 | 19篇 |
| 2011年 | 15篇 |
| 2010年 | 13篇 |
| 2009年 | 13篇 |
| 2008年 | 14篇 |
| 2007年 | 17篇 |
| 2006年 | 12篇 |
| 2005年 | 5篇 |
| 2004年 | 9篇 |
| 2003年 | 11篇 |
| 2002年 | 9篇 |
| 2001年 | 1篇 |
| 2000年 | 1篇 |
| 1999年 | 2篇 |
| 1998年 | 1篇 |
| 1997年 | 1篇 |
| 1996年 | 2篇 |
| 1995年 | 5篇 |
| 1994年 | 3篇 |
| 1993年 | 2篇 |
| 1992年 | 5篇 |
| 1990年 | 1篇 |
| 1989年 | 3篇 |
| 1988年 | 2篇 |
| 1982年 | 1篇 |
| 1981年 | 3篇 |
| 1980年 | 1篇 |
| 1977年 | 1篇 |
| 1974年 | 1篇 |
| 1964年 | 1篇 |
排序方式： 共有437条查询结果，搜索用时 31 毫秒
431.
432.
This paper identifies what can be called the ‘paradox of interdisciplinarity’ (Weingart 2000) in Australian higher education research governance and explores some of its constitutive dimensions. In the Australian context, the paradox of interdisciplinarity primarily concerns the proliferation of a programmatic discourse of interdisciplinarity in government reports and government policy and strategy documents, often tied to notions of innovation and applicability, parallel to the persistence or even reinforcement of modes of governance and associated mechanisms that almost exclusively rely on rigid discipline-based classification systems to evaluate and fund research. Two interrelated dimensions of this apparent paradox are discussed. First, the conceptions of knowledge that underpin the use of notions of disciplinarity as well as interdisciplinarity in Australian government reports and policy and strategy papers are analysed. Second, an analysis of the Australian research governance system and its underlying mechanisms is presented, as they pertain to interdisciplinary forms of research. On the basis of these analyses, it is concluded that there is a significant mismatch between the discourse of interdisciplinarity and associated conceptions of knowledge on the one hand, and current, relatively inflexible governmental research funding and evaluation practices on the other. It is finally proposed that the occurrence and perpetuation of such a mismatch in the Australian context can only be understood properly if placed in the context of a more general paradox of research governance, where a politically charged rhetoric of innovation conflicts with the actual trend toward an increasingly diminishing scope for the self-organisation of knowledge. 相似文献
433.
434.
435.
Asha K. Jitendra Barbara Dougherty Victoria Sanchez Michael R. Harwell Sydney Harbour 《Learning disabilities research & practice》2023,38(4):285-295
This formative study of a multiplicative reasoning (MR) intervention explored the intervention's potential for improving the ability of third-grade struggling students’ ability to reason with multiplicative concepts and procedures. The feasibility of the study was examined in a school setting before a randomized control trial was conducted. Students who scored between the 10th and 35th percentile on a district-administered math screening test received the MR intervention from their teachers. We developed intervention units to build a conceptual foundation in a student-centered approach to Tier 2 instruction that included opportunities for students to engage in critical thinking as they generalized big ideas, participated in classroom discourse, and modeled multiplicative relationships with multiple representations. Preliminary data demonstrate the potential of the intervention to promote students’ MR skills. Instructional implications are discussed in terms of opportunities for these students to engage in grade-level mathematics content. 相似文献
436.
437.
Ahmed Lachheb Victoria Abramenka-Lachheb Stephanie Moore Colin Gray 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2023,54(6):1653-1670
Maintaining students' privacy in higher education, an integral aspect of learning design and technology integration, is not only a matter of policy and law but also a matter of design ethics. Similar to faculty educators, learning designers in higher education play a vital role in maintaining students' privacy by designing learning experiences that rely on online technology integration. Like other professional designers, they need to care for the humans they design for by not producing designs that infringe on their privacy, thus, not causing harm. Recognizing that widely used instructional design models are silent on the topic and do not address ethical considerations such as privacy, we focus this paper on how design ethics can be leveraged by learning designers in higher education in a practical manner, illustrated through authentic examples. We highlight where the ethical responsibility of learning designers comes into the foreground when maintaining students' privacy and well-being, especially in online settings. We outline an existing ethical decision-making framework and show how learning designers can use it as a call to action to protect the students they design for, strengthening their ethical design capacity.
Practitioner notes
What is already known about this topic- Existing codes of ethical standards from well-known learning design organizations call upon learning designers to protect students' privacy without clear guidance on how to do so.
- Design ethics within learning design is often discussed in abstract ways with principles that are difficult to apply.
- Most, if not all, design models that learning design professionals have learned are either silent on design ethics and/or do not consider ethics as a valid dimension, thus, making design ethics mostly excluded from learning design graduate programs.
- Practical means for engaging in ethical design practice are scarce in the field.
- A call for learning designers in higher education to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being, strengthening their ethical design capacity.
- A demonstration of how to use a practical ethical decision-making framework as a designerly tool in designing for learning to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being.
- Authentic examples—in the form of vignettes—of ethical dilemmas/issues that learning designers in higher education could face, focused on students' privacy.
- Methods—using a practical ethical decision-making framework—for learning design professionals in higher education, grounded in the philosophy of designers as the guarantors of designs, to be employed to detect situations where students' privacy and best interests are at risk.
- A demonstration of how learning designers could make stellar design decisions in service to the students they design for and not to the priorities of other design stakeholders.
- Higher education programs/institutions that prepare/employ learning designers ought to treat the topics of the designer's responsibility and design ethics more explicitly and practically as one of the means to maintain and protect students' privacy, in addition to law and policies.
- Learning designers in higher education ought to hold a powerful position in their professional practice to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being, as an important aspect of their ethical design responsibilities.
- Learning designers in higher education ought to adopt a design thinking mindset in order to protect students' privacy by (1) challenging ideas and assumptions regarding technology integration in general and (2) detecting what is known in User Experience (UX) design as “dark patterns” in online course design.