首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   13028篇
  免费   231篇
  国内免费   13篇
教育   10122篇
科学研究   548篇
各国文化   201篇
体育   810篇
综合类   8篇
文化理论   141篇
信息传播   1442篇
  2023年   41篇
  2022年   65篇
  2021年   164篇
  2020年   281篇
  2019年   420篇
  2018年   487篇
  2017年   539篇
  2016年   502篇
  2015年   324篇
  2014年   421篇
  2013年   2904篇
  2012年   385篇
  2011年   390篇
  2010年   335篇
  2009年   362篇
  2008年   403篇
  2007年   369篇
  2006年   311篇
  2005年   337篇
  2004年   326篇
  2003年   305篇
  2002年   256篇
  2001年   200篇
  2000年   221篇
  1999年   172篇
  1998年   135篇
  1997年   190篇
  1996年   192篇
  1995年   156篇
  1994年   161篇
  1993年   146篇
  1992年   160篇
  1991年   121篇
  1990年   133篇
  1989年   100篇
  1988年   111篇
  1987年   79篇
  1986年   99篇
  1985年   120篇
  1984年   109篇
  1983年   110篇
  1982年   86篇
  1981年   94篇
  1980年   72篇
  1979年   55篇
  1978年   50篇
  1977年   37篇
  1976年   41篇
  1975年   29篇
  1974年   22篇
排序方式: 共有10000条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
111.
112.
113.
114.
Although creativity and expertise are related, they are nonetheless very different things. Expertise does not usually require creativity, but creativity generally does require a certain level of expertise. There are similarities in the relationships of both expertise and creativity to domains, however. Research has shown that just as expertise in one domain does not predict expertise in other, unrelated domains, creativity in one domain does not predict creativity in other, unrelated domains. People may be expert, and people may be creative, in many domains, or they may be expert, or creative, in few domains or none at all, and one cannot simply transfer expertise, or creativity, from one domain to another, unrelated domain. The domain specificity of creativity matters crucially for creativity training, creativity assessment, creativity research, and creativity theory. The domain specificity of creativity also means that interdisciplinary thinking, interdisciplinary collaboration, and interdisciplinary creativity are even more important than one would assume if creativity were domain general.  相似文献   
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
There is a crisis of valuation practices in the current academic life sciences, triggered by unsustainable growth and “hyper-competition.” Quantitative metrics in evaluating researchers are seen as replacing deeper considerations of the quality and novelty of work, as well as substantive care for the societal implications of research. Junior researchers are frequently mentioned as those most strongly affected by these dynamics. However, their own perceptions of these issues are much less frequently considered. This paper aims at contributing to a better understanding of the interplay between how research is valued and how young researchers learn to live, work and produce knowledge within academia. We thus analyze how PhD students and postdocs in the Austrian life sciences ascribe worth to people, objects and practices as they talk about their own present and future lives in research. We draw on literature from the field of valuation studies and its interest in how actors refer to different forms of valuation to account for their actions. We explore how young researchers are socialized into different valuation practices in different stages of their growing into science. Introducing the concept of “regimes of valuation” we show that PhD students relate to a wider evaluative repertoire while postdocs base their decisions on one dominant regime of valuing research. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of these findings for the epistemic and social development of the life sciences, and for other scientific fields.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号