Interpersonal Relations: Some Suggestions for Theory Development     

JOHN W. ROBINSON  AL HERMAN 《Counselor Education & Supervision》1984,24(1):28-39

This article argues the need for theory development in the field of interpersonal relations training. Criteria, based on the four major divisions of philosophic inquiry (ontology, logic, axiology, and epistemology), are presented for assessing the substantive adequacy of interpersonal relations training theories. Three views of interpersonal relations—Ivey and Authier's Microcounseling, Kagan's Interpersonal Process Recall, and Strong's Social Psychological Approach—are then examined using these four criteria.  相似文献   

‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers     

David Nicholas  Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri  Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo  Eti Herman  Abdullah Abrizah  David Clark  Galina Serbina  David Sims  Marzena Świgoń  Jie Xu  Anthony Watkinson  Hamid R. Jamali  Carol Tenopir  Suzie Allard 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):319-322

• 170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.
• The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.
• The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.

  相似文献