全文获取类型
| 收费全文 | 650篇 |
| 免费 | 9篇 |
| 国内免费 | 1篇 |
专业分类
| 教育 | 443篇 |
| 科学研究 | 44篇 |
| 各国文化 | 9篇 |
| 体育 | 78篇 |
| 文化理论 | 1篇 |
| 信息传播 | 85篇 |
出版年
| 2023年 | 6篇 |
| 2022年 | 5篇 |
| 2021年 | 22篇 |
| 2020年 | 14篇 |
| 2019年 | 31篇 |
| 2018年 | 35篇 |
| 2017年 | 39篇 |
| 2016年 | 39篇 |
| 2015年 | 18篇 |
| 2014年 | 19篇 |
| 2013年 | 153篇 |
| 2012年 | 28篇 |
| 2011年 | 25篇 |
| 2010年 | 17篇 |
| 2009年 | 16篇 |
| 2008年 | 19篇 |
| 2007年 | 18篇 |
| 2006年 | 13篇 |
| 2005年 | 10篇 |
| 2004年 | 7篇 |
| 2003年 | 12篇 |
| 2002年 | 7篇 |
| 2001年 | 10篇 |
| 2000年 | 12篇 |
| 1999年 | 11篇 |
| 1998年 | 7篇 |
| 1997年 | 3篇 |
| 1996年 | 9篇 |
| 1995年 | 5篇 |
| 1994年 | 3篇 |
| 1992年 | 6篇 |
| 1991年 | 4篇 |
| 1989年 | 3篇 |
| 1988年 | 3篇 |
| 1983年 | 4篇 |
| 1981年 | 1篇 |
| 1980年 | 2篇 |
| 1979年 | 3篇 |
| 1978年 | 1篇 |
| 1977年 | 3篇 |
| 1976年 | 1篇 |
| 1975年 | 2篇 |
| 1974年 | 1篇 |
| 1973年 | 1篇 |
| 1972年 | 1篇 |
| 1970年 | 1篇 |
| 1969年 | 2篇 |
| 1934年 | 1篇 |
| 1862年 | 1篇 |
| 1830年 | 1篇 |
排序方式： 共有660条查询结果，搜索用时 328 毫秒
651.
652.
Jenny Yun-Chen Chan Chloe Byrne Janette Jerusal Allison S. Liu Justin Roberts Erin Ottmar 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2023,54(4):943-966
Prior research has shown that game-based learning tools, such as DragonBox 12+, support algebraic understanding and that students' in-game progress positively predicts their later performance. Using data from 253 seventh-graders (12–13 years old) who played DragonBox as a part of technology intervention, we examined (a) the relations between students' progress within DragonBox and their algebraic knowledge and general mathematics achievement, (b) the moderating effects of students' prior performance on these relations and (c) the potential factors associated with students' in-game progress. Among students with higher prior algebraic knowledge, higher in-game progress was related to higher algebraic knowledge after the intervention. Higher in-game progress was also associated with higher end-of-year mathematics achievement, and this association was stronger among students with lower prior mathematics achievement. Students' demographic characteristics, prior knowledge and prior achievement did not significantly predict in-game progress beyond the number of intervention sessions students completed. These findings advance research on how, for whom and in what contexts game-based interventions, such as DragonBox, support mathematical learning and have implications for practice using game-based technologies to supplement instruction.
Practitioner notes
What is already known about this topic- DragonBox 12+ may support students' understanding of algebra but the findings are mixed.
- Students who solve more problems within math games tend to show higher performance after gameplay.
- Students' engagement with mathematics is often related to their prior math performance.
- For students with higher prior algebraic knowledge, solving more problems in DragonBox 12+ is related to higher algebraic performance after gameplay.
- Students who make more in-game progress also have higher mathematics achievement, especially for students with lower prior achievement.
- Students who spend more time playing DragonBox 12+ make more in-game progress; their demographic, prior knowledge and prior achievement are not related to in-game progress.
- DragonBox 12+ can be beneficial as a supplement to algebra instruction for students with some understanding of algebra.
- DragonBox 12+ can engage students with mathematics across achievement levels.
- Dedicating time and encouraging students to play DragonBox 12+ may help them make more in-game progress, and in turn, support math learning.
653.
654.
655.
656.
Danielle Lester Gregory J. Skulmoski Darren P. Fisher Vishal Mehrotra Iris Lim Alexander Lang Justin W. L. Keogh 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2023,54(6):1748-1770
While gamification and game-based learning have both been demonstrated to have a host of educational benefits for university students, many university educators do not routinely use these approaches in their teaching. Therefore, this systematic review, conducted using the PRISMA guidelines, sought to identify the primary drivers and barriers to the use of gamification and game-based learning by university educators. A search of multiple databases (Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCO (Business Source Complete; ERIC; Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts)) identified 1330 articles, with 1096 retained after duplicates were removed. Seventeen articles (11 quantitative, two mixed-methods and four qualitative) were included in the systematic review. The primary drivers described by the educators that positively influenced their gamification and game-based learning usage were their beliefs that it encourages student interactions and collaborative learning; provides fun and improves engagement; and can easily be used by students. Alternatively, the university educators' major barriers included a lack of time to develop gamification approaches, lack of proven benefits and classroom setting issues. Many of these and other less commonly reported drivers and barriers can be categorised as attitudinal, design-related or administrative in nature. Such categorisations may assist university educators, teaching support staff and administrators in better understanding the primary factors influencing the utilisation of gamification and game-based learning and develop more effective strategies to overcome these barriers to its successful implementation.
Practitioner notes
What is already known about this topic
- Gamification and game-based learning may have many benefits for university students.
- The majority of university educators do not routinely use gamification and game-based learning in their teaching.
What this paper adds
- University educators' major drivers that positively influence the use of gamification and game-based learning include their perceptions that it encourages student interactions and collaborative learning, provides fun and improves engagement and can easily be used by students.
- University educators' major barriers that negatively influence the use of gamification and game-based learning include their perceptions of a lack of time to develop gamification approaches, lack of proven benefits and classroom setting issues.
- These drivers and barriers may be classified as attitudinal, design-related and administrative, with these categories providing a useful way for universities to develop strategies to better support educators who wish to use these approaches in their teaching.
Implications for practice and policy
- Attitudinal factors such as university educators' intention to use gamification and game-based learning are influenced by a host of their perceptions including attitude, perceived usefulness and ease of use.
- A range of design-related and administrative barriers may need to be overcome to increase the use of gamification and game-based learning in the university sector.
657.
658.
659.
660.
Jomon A. Paul Mona Sinha Justin D. Cochran 《Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education》2023,21(3):123-143
Critical thinking (CT) skills are essential to academic and professional success. Instruments to assess CT often rely on multiple-choice formats with inherent problems. This research presents two instruments for assessing CT, an essay and open-ended group-discussion format, which were implemented in an undergraduate business course at a large public university. The topics were intentionally chosen to be digitally-related (internet access and social media) since they raise complex issues, are applicable in many disciplines, and students are avid users, thereby making these instruments relevant, multidisciplinary, engaging, and multifaceted. These instruments may be adapted to enable educators to effectively assess undergraduate students’ ability to think critically. Qualitative analysis of the verbatim data with NVivo helps demonstrate the instruments’ efficacy in assessing CT, with (1) high-quality responses receiving high grades, and (2) overarching themes identified by content analysis, that coalesce into the three dimensions of social justice theory (distributive, procedural, and interactional), thus illustrating students’ consideration of complex fairness norms and societal needs. Excerpts of student responses are provided as illustrations of the indicators/evidence of critical thinking. Educators can use these instruments to first assess students’ CT skills, and then devise targeted interventions to improve the quality of students’ thought processes. 相似文献