首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   70篇
  免费   1篇
教育   55篇
科学研究   5篇
各国文化   1篇
体育   5篇
文化理论   1篇
信息传播   4篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   1篇
  2021年   1篇
  2020年   4篇
  2019年   8篇
  2018年   3篇
  2017年   10篇
  2016年   3篇
  2015年   1篇
  2014年   5篇
  2013年   6篇
  2012年   2篇
  2011年   5篇
  2010年   2篇
  2008年   2篇
  2006年   1篇
  2005年   2篇
  2004年   1篇
  2001年   1篇
  1998年   2篇
  1997年   2篇
  1995年   1篇
  1988年   2篇
  1987年   1篇
  1985年   1篇
  1931年   1篇
排序方式: 共有71条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
71.

Background

Commercial speed-reading training programs are typically marketed with the promise to dramatically increase reading speed without impairing comprehension. From the perspective of reading psychology, it seems quite unlikely that speed-reading training can indeed have such effects. However, research on the effectiveness of modern speed-reading training programs on reading performance in typical readers is sparse. The present study had two goals. First, we sought to extend prior research on speed-reading by assessing the effects of a speed-reading application on reading performance in a pre-training and post-training design with a control group. Second, we aimed to identify the mechanism underlying speed-reading training programs.

Methods

We assessed reading speed, comprehension and eye movements of 30 German-speaking undergraduates (Mage = 22.77 years, SDage = 3.41 years) before and after they received a commercial, app-based speed-reading training, a metacognitive training or no training.

Results

Results revealed higher reading speed in the speed-reading condition and metacognitive condition compared with the control condition, although not to the extent claimed in the application. Eye-movement data indicated that the increase in reading speed was due to fewer and shorter fixations in measures reflecting late but not early lexical processing. No differences in comprehension performance were observed between the three conditions.

Conclusions

We discuss our findings in support of the idea that the increase in reading speed was not caused by a change in basic characteristics of participants' reading behaviour, but rather by an increase in their awareness of their own reading process. Further research is needed to investigate whether the observed effects are maintained over time.
  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号