African philosophy for successful integration of technology in higher education     

Teklu Abate Bekele  Samuel Amponsah  Ibrahim M. Karkouti 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2023,54(6):1520-1538

Due partly to the multimodal and multiscalar nature of technology applications, there lacks theories to explain successful technology integration in teaching and learning in higher education. Such multidisciplinary theories developed primarily within Western contexts as behaviourism, cognitivism, constructivism, connectivism, collaborationism, TPACK framework and authentic learning theory have been used to underpin technology-enhanced teaching and learning globally. However, their primary focus on basic education and their sensitivity to contextual reality seem to restrict their salience and fecundity to successfully explain technology integration in higher education in the Global South, including Africa. For more contextual relevance and significance, the embodiment in curricula and pedagogy of African knowledge systems and emerging societal needs and challenges is thus critical. Drawing on Asabiyya and Ubuntu humanistic philosophies respectively from Northern and Southern Africa and Yoruba empiricist and Zara Yacob rationalist epistemologies from Western and Eastern Africa, this study proposes African philosophical perspectives to underpin technology integration in higher education. The epistemologies define the nature of student and faculty engagements and strategies, whereas the humanistic philosophies offer values that could guide ethical technology use and engagement. Technologies are conceived alternatively as knowledge banks, communication media and cognitive tools to think through and with. Implications for further research and practice are identified.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

• Multidisciplinary theories developed primarily within Western contexts are used to underpin technology-enhanced teaching and learning globally.
• Their primary focus on basic education and their sensitivity to socio-cultural and economic contextual reality restrict their salience and fecundity to successfully explain technology integration in teaching and learning in higher education in the Global South, including Africa.
• African philosophical, theoretical, conceptual and methodological thinking is critical for successful technology integration.

What this paper adds

• This study interrogated how African philosophies of humanity and knowledge could support successful technology integration in teaching and learning in Africa.
• Drawing on Asabiyya and Ubuntu philosophies, respectively, from Northern and Southern Africa, the study proposes strategies for making the oppressive faculty–student relationships rampant in African campuses more humane and emancipatory.
• Drawing on Yoruba empiricist and Zara Yacob rationalist epistemological orientations from Western and Eastern Africa, this study proposes strategies for supporting truly engaging and empowering pedagogies within technology-enhanced spaces.

Implications for practice and/or policy

• The purpose of education in successful technology-enhanced spaces needs to aim at improving student capacities and skills for further learning and to ensure full participation in practice communities within and outside higher education.
• The content of education or curriculum needs to primarily embody African/local philosophical, theoretical, conceptual and methodological thinking, as well as emerging community needs and challenges.
• The method of education and student assessment need to support and promote the cultivation of student skills and capabilities as well as values and ethics highly needed in their communities and beyond.

  相似文献   

CONTINUITY,CHANGE, AND CURATOR: THE MUSEUM JOURNAL     

Samuel M. Taylor 《Curator: The Museum Journal》2003,46(1):5-6

  相似文献   

A Note from the Editor     

Samuel M. Taylor 《Curator: The Museum Journal》1991,34(4):316-316

  相似文献   

A NOTE FROM THE EDITOR     

Samuel M. Taylor 《Curator: The Museum Journal》2001,44(3):221-221

  相似文献   

Training clinic     

Samuel Katz 《Performance Improvement》1978,17(8):26-26

  相似文献   

Training clinic     

Samuel Katz 《Performance Improvement》1978,17(10):13-13

  相似文献   

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS     

Samuel M. Taylor  Zahava Doering  Kay Larson 《Curator: The Museum Journal》2003,46(4):443-444

  相似文献   

Acknowledgments     

Samuel M. Taylor 《Curator: The Museum Journal》1993,36(4):325-325

  相似文献