首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   130篇
  免费   2篇
  国内免费   3篇
教育   96篇
科学研究   12篇
体育   4篇
信息传播   23篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   4篇
  2021年   10篇
  2020年   7篇
  2019年   6篇
  2018年   6篇
  2017年   3篇
  2016年   3篇
  2015年   3篇
  2014年   24篇
  2013年   21篇
  2012年   16篇
  2011年   13篇
  2010年   1篇
  2009年   1篇
  2008年   2篇
  2007年   3篇
  2006年   2篇
  2005年   2篇
  2003年   2篇
  2001年   1篇
  1996年   2篇
排序方式: 共有135条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
41.
在法国大学校工程师教育中,学校与企业的关系主要表现为:企业直接参与学校人才培养管理,常态的产学研合作模式,基于企业和工程师大学合作关系的职业培训机制,企业对学校在教学设备和实验仪器上的资助.企业培养方案的制定是落实“卓越工程师教育培养计划”的核心环节,是工程教育的重要特征和本质要求.法国高等工程师教育对我国“卓越工程师教育培养计划”中企业培养方案的制定带来的启示包括:人才培养标准应由教育界与工业界联合制定,创立全面的高校与行业企业联合培养人才的新机制,“卓越工程师教育培养计划”应实行双导师制,要配合企业“走出去”战略,把培养具备国际视野,能够进行跨文化交流、合作和参与国际竞争的工程师作为重要内容,实行以企业需求为导向的选择性人才培养,要达到学校、企业和学生三方共赢的局面.  相似文献   
42.
卓越工程师培养是高等教育尤其是工科院校目前面临的重要任务。当下,我国高等工程教育存在着思想发生错位、实践性并未凸显、生源质量下降、师资力量弱化等问题。在对高等工程教育培养现状的理性分析基础上,指出实施"卓越工程师教育培养计划"的主要途径:提升教育理念,明确培养定位;提高教师素质,打造优秀团队;强化实践环节,加强校企合作;优化育人环境,创新教学方法。  相似文献   
43.
论“卓越计划”实施背景下高等工程教育课程体系设计   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
“卓越计划”实施的目标是改善高等工程教育质量,更好地向社会输送高质量的工程师,其中,科学合理的高等工程教育课程体系是“卓越计划”成功的关键。本文以“卓越计划”实施为背景,从课程结构、课程内容与课程实施3个方面,分析了高等工程教育课程体系及其问题。阐述了高等工程教育课程体系设计的原则与途径。  相似文献   
44.
Background Over the past four decades there have been a number of controversies arising from the discussion of ‘equity’ and ‘equality’. These concepts are often invoked by policy analysts, policy-makers, government officials and scholars in order to justify or critique resource allocation to different levels of the educational system.

Purpose By creating a new equality–equity goal-oriented model, which allows the combination of different dimensions for each concept with different stages of the educational process, this paper aims to achieve two purposes: (1) to clarify among researchers, educators, evaluators, policy analysts, and policy-makers the notions of ‘equality’ and ‘equity’; and (2) to encourage researchers and evaluators to critically examine and synthesize equality/equity-based research.

Sources of evidence A review of the literature concerning the meaning, goals and assumptions of the concepts ‘equity’ and ‘equality’, and their implications for social and public policy, is presented.

Main argument A survey of recent and earlier debates on ‘equity’ and ‘equality’ among scholars and researchers reveals disagreement and confusion about what those concepts really mean and what they involve in terms of goals and results. It is debatable whether we can have ‘equity’ and ‘equality’ in a society that prioritizes efficiency in resource management over social justice. Certainly, such questions have shaped and guided many discussions and theoretical debates among scholars, policy analysts and policy-makers.

Conclusions Most of the definitions of ‘equity’ and ‘equality’ are frequently used by many researchers, evaluators, policy-makers, policy analysts, scholars and educators as if they were interchangeable. Instead of arguing for a unique or simple conception of ‘equity’ and ‘equality’, a set of definitions of those concepts as well as a discussion related to theoretical and policy issues associated are presented. In order to avoid that confusion, the equality–equity model developed in this paper suggests several new directions for analysis and research. It provides some ideas about how ‘equity’ (i.e. ‘equity for equal needs’, ‘equity for equal potential’ and ‘equity for equal achievement’) and ‘equality’ (i.e. ‘equality of opportunity’, ‘equality for all’ and ‘equality on average across social groups’) could be treated and measured in future research in relation to different features of the educational process (availability of resources, access, survival, output and outcome).  相似文献   
45.
This paper reports findings from a study that focused on the experiences of research-intensive academics in relation to the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Framework. Interviews with academic staff at different career stages and across all academic faculties followed completion of a short survey in which respondents compared their publishing behaviour before and since implementation of the new Framework. Respondents were highly conscious that ERA had prompted a shift in publishing behaviour to meet often competing demands of individual research interests, institution, discipline and the international research community. Indeed, the study revealed academics to be positioned in contradictory ways in relation to their research and publishing, heightened by the instability of the Framework's assessment mechanisms. The experience of researchers up to, and including, the decision to abandon journal ranking provides valuable insights into the precarious and reactionary nature of academic research careers and the ability of both individuals and institutions to negotiate the rapid rate of change. These insights include tension between personal research priorities and ERA requirements, particularly in relation to writing for the most relevant audience, and concerns about the right to exercise academic freedom.  相似文献   
46.
依托勘查技术与工程专业"卓越工程师教育培养计划"和胜利油田与中国石油大学(华东)共建勘查技术与工程专业工程实践教育中心,对勘查技术与工程专业卓越计划工程教育培养模式进行了探索,通过校企合作、师生互动、制度完善建立了勘查技术与工程专业大学生工程教育的实践平台和培养基地,形成了面向应用的勘查技术与工程专业卓越计划工程教育培养模式。  相似文献   
47.
The UK's Research Excellence Framework (REF) is a system that is intended to evaluate the quality of the research produced by higher education institutes (HEIs) in the UK in three areas: quality of research outputs; impact of this research beyond academia; and research environment. For the next REF, the funding bodies have reviewed the importance of the three assessment elements and decided to increase the weight of ‘impact’ to 25% (from 20% in REF2014) and decrease the weight of ‘outputs’ to 60% (from 65% in REF2014). This article first examines the relevance of some factors for the quality of impact submissions in REF2014 and finds that larger submissions and institutes with higher external research income received better impact scores in the REF. The article then examines the units of assessment (UoAs) and HEIs that benefitted from the inclusion of the impact agenda as part of REF2014 by examining the distribution of the quality-related research (QR) funding in the 2017–2018 period and finds that the QR funding gap among different UoAs tends to decrease but the gap among HEIs in most of the UoAs increased. With the increased importance of the impact agenda as a criterion for funding bodies, it is expected that research income will be concentrated in fewer universities in the future, with the increased importance of non-academic impact. This article also discusses some of the gaming strategies and long-term investment priorities that HEIs may engage in based on the new submission rules of the next REF.  相似文献   
48.
“卓越工程师教育培养计划”的主要目标是面向工业界、面向世界、面向未来,培养造就一大批创新能力强、适应经济社会发展需要的高质量各类型工程技术人才。本文在卓越计划的宗旨下,分析了吉首大学环境工程专业课程教学中存在的一些问题,针对这些问题对环境工程专业课程教学改革进行了初步探索,提出对应的改革措施。  相似文献   
49.
The aim of this article is to present the results of the empirical validation of the PROFICIENCyIn + E rubric for teacher self-evaluation, which allows us to know to what extent primary and secondary teachers consider themselves competent in eleven of the key competencies that have been identified through the review of the literature. The rubric has an online format and digital access through a learning management system aimed at schools. After completing it, teachers receive a personalized report on their competence profile. The reliability results show acceptable indices of internal consistency and empirical validation through the Multidimensional Non-Metre Scaling (PROXSCAL) procedure, suggesting that the rubric is an effective tool to evaluate teaching skills in non-university teaching. The use of this tool offers real opportunities for self-improvement and reflection amongst teachers related to their competencies and how to plan their professional development.  相似文献   
50.
ABSTRACT

In this article, the notion of excellence in relation to teaching is removed from its privileged place in order to render it, and its implications, for analysis. We argue that teaching excellence needs to be understood in the larger context of the neoliberal university in which competition is taken for granted, and therefore, metrics for comparison are evermore necessary. Following this argument, we explore excellence as an instrument of neoliberal ideology in higher education. We explore different manifestations of teaching excellence enacted in policies that that are illustrative of five different countries. Implications for further analysis, and for resistance to the expansion of neoliberal ideology through teaching excellence, are presented.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号