Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology     

Brett Smith  Kerry R. McGannon 《International review of sport and exercise psychology》2018,11(1):101-121

Qualitative research has grown within sport and exercise psychology and is now widely conducted. The purpose of this review is to discuss three commonly used ways to demonstrate rigor when conducting or judging qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology. These are the method of member checking, the method of inter-rater reliability, and the notion of universal criteria. Problems with each method are first highlighted. Member checking and inter-rater reliability are shown to be ineffective for verification, trustworthiness, or reliability purposes. Next, universal criteria within the context of Tracy’s, heavily drawn on paper within sport and exercise psychology is problematized. Throughout the discussion of each method and universal criteria more suitable possibilities for conducting rigorous qualitative research are offered. The paper concludes that to support high-quality qualitative research, scholars – including journal editors and reviewers – need to change how rigor is developed and judged, rather than perpetuate the problems with how it has been commonly evaluated in the past. Recommendations for developing rigor when conducting and/or judging qualitative research within sport and exercise psychology are also offered.  相似文献   

从普遍知识到高深学问——大学观念的知识论逻辑及其变迁   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

王晨 《清华大学教育研究》2006,27(5):11-16

本文结合西方社会和思想史进程,描述了大学观念的知识论基础的三个发展阶段。即从中世纪时期宗教性真理统一观念之下的普遍知识论,到近代脱胎于普遍知识的与专业知识相对立的自由知识,再到现代独立的高深学问知识论逻辑。并认为现代性影响下的高深学问论存在自致性矛盾,从而成为现代大学困境形成的因素之一。突破困境则需要对这单一的逻辑起点进行改造和扩充。  相似文献