论政府信息资源的元数据标准   总被引：13，自引：1，他引：13  

曹树金  司徒俊峰  马利霞 《情报学报》2004,23(6):715-722

本文论述了世界上主要的两种政府元数据标准 :GILS(政府信息定位服务 )和DC Government(都柏林核心政府元数据 ) ,比较了多国政府元数据标准及其本土化应用 ,最后提出了建设我国政府元数据框架的构想  相似文献   

校园一卡通系统与图书馆读者数据库的建设   总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8  

赵晓玲 《图书馆论坛》2004,24(3):104-106

校园一卡通系统需要一个规范而标准的图书馆读者数据库与之相衔接，文章在分析图书馆原有读者数据库中存在问题的基础上，提出了清理和完善该数据库的若干措施，并在实际应用中加以实施。  相似文献   

ISBN的不规范现象与图书馆的应对措施   总被引：4，自引：1，他引：4  

蒋鸿标 《图书馆杂志》2004,23(5):37-37

ISBN与图书本来具有唯一性，但不少多卷书或丛书的总题名既有ISBN，各分卷(册)又有不同的ISBN，这是出版界对ISBN的滥用。图书馆在处理这类图书时，应根据不同的处理方式采用与正题名相对应的ISBN。  相似文献   

ECIP自动编目软件系统设计思想的探讨--兼与张丽娟等同志商榷   总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3  

蒋小耘 《图书馆杂志》2005,24(11):18-20

本文对ECIP计划中自动编目的MARC标准设定问题及自动编目系统实现的设计思想提出了自己的不同见解。  相似文献   

高等院校分层发展刍议     

蔡延泉  吴海光 《煤炭高等教育》2006,24(5):61-63

当前在我国高等院校分层发展中凸现出不少问题,主要原因在于我国尚无公认合理的高校分层标准。从宏观层面分析,分层标准制定中有以下不可或缺的因素:师资水平和生源质量是高校分层的人力依据,教育设施、设备的优劣是高校分层的物力依据,教学、科研经费的多寡是高校分层的财力依据。在高校分层过程中,要强化社会评价体系和评价机制在高校分层中的角色扮演,淡化政府主管部门的地位和作用,注重高校自主定位的科学性。  相似文献   

兴奋剂违规案件的证明责任问题——以“Contador案”为视角          下载免费PDF全文

柴毛毛 《体育科研》2019,(5):60-69,78

运用案例分析法，将证据法学和体育法学交叉综合，对国际体育仲裁院仲裁庭（CAS）就“Contador案”所作的裁决进行分析。以从CAS的裁决中寻找有益的观点，为完善《世界反兴奋剂条例》及以之为蓝本的其他反兴奋剂条例中关于证明责任分配与证明标准的规定提供借鉴。“Contador案”的裁决采纳了证据法学中将证明责任分为法定说服责任与提供证据的责任的观点，认为不承担法定说服责任的当事人在对方当事人举证困难的情况下，也应承担提供证据协助查明案情的责任。这一观点应当为《世界反兴奋剂条例》所借鉴，以补充细化第3.1条中关于证明责任的规定。  相似文献   

Assessing Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use of Institutional Repositories by Lecturers in Nigerian Universities     

Alice A. Bamigbola  Airen E. Adetimirin 《International Information and Library Review》2020,52(2):95-107

Abstract

Institutional repositories (IRs) present platform to disseminate research findings to complement the traditional scholarly communication model. The use of IRs is beneficial to authors, host institutions, libraries and society at large. Despite the numerous benefits of IRs, there is low deposit of scholarly works by lecturers and the investment on IRs seems to be a waste. This study examined determinants of perceived ease of use (PEOU) of IRs by lecturers in Nigerian universities. A survey of lecturers received 857 respondents. Awareness, anchor and adjustment factors were found to be determinants of PEOU of Institutional repositories by lecturers in Nigerian Universities.  相似文献   

A historical analysis of academic development using the theoretical lens of Pierre Bourdieu     

Bruce Charles Kloot 《British Journal of Sociology of Education》2015,36(6):958-975

This paper provides a history of academic development by examining how a South African institution coped with the potent social forces confronting it before the collapse of apartheid. Theoretically, it draws on the framework of Pierre Bourdieu and engages with a paper written a decade ago by Naidoo, who also used Bourdieu to understand institutional change in South Africa in the late 1980s. Through contrasting the habitus of two professors, it is argued that academic development helps to preserve the autonomy of the university field by refracting forces impinging on it from the economic and political realms.  相似文献   

The Issue of Range Restriction in Bookmark Standard Setting          下载免费PDF全文

Adam E. Wyse 《Educational Measurement》2015,34(2):47-54

This article uses data from a large‐scale assessment program to illustrate the potential issue of range restriction with the Bookmark method in the context of trying to set cut scores to closely align with a set of college and career readiness benchmarks. Analyses indicated that range restriction issues existed across different response probability (RP) values and item response theory (IRT) models if one were to apply the Bookmark procedure using intact test forms. Results also suggested that range restriction may still be present if one had access to additional data from an item bank. This demonstration critically highlights challenges that may exist in some practical applications of the Bookmark method due items not being designed to cover the full range of examinee abilities.  相似文献   

A Critical Look into the Beuk Standard-Setting Method     

Adam E. Wyse 《Educational Measurement》2020,39(1):52-60

One commonly used compromise standard-setting method is the Beuk (1984) method. A key assumption of the Beuk method is that the emphasis given to the pass rate and the percent correct ratings should be proportional to the extent that the panelists agree on their ratings. However, whether the slope of Beuk line reflects the emphasis that panelists believe should be assigned to the pass rate and the percentage correct ratings has not be fully tested. In this article, I evaluate this critical assumption of the Beuk method by asking panelists to assign importance weights to their percentage correct and pass rate judgments. I show that in several cases that the emphasis suggested by the Beuk slope is noticeably different from what one would expect and is inconsistent with importance weight ratings. I also suggest two ways that the importance weights can be used to calculate alternate cut scores, and I show that one of the ways of calculating cut scores using the importance weights leads to larger potential differences in cut score estimates. I suggest that practitioners should consider collecting importance weights when the Beuk method is used for determining cut scores.  相似文献