中国情报学研究的继承与发展(1990～2005)     

段宇锋  寇功杰 《情报学报》2008,27(2):285-294

本研究以维普期刊论文数据库为数据来源,利用专用软件分析1990年至2005年间我国情报学核心期刊所载文献的学科分布和主题的变化,得到四点结论:①情报学的研究对象和学科定位等是情报学界最关心的论题;②情报检索一直是情报学的主要研究领域;③企业是情报学应用研究的主体;④信息资源观的形成是情报学取得的最显著的成就.并进一步指出,情报学研究存在三个方面的问题:①研究内容过于集中,各领域发展严重失衡;②长期悬而未决的基本理论问题之争是情报学发展最大的隐患;③情报学的应用研究亟待加强.  相似文献   

民族地区图书馆与非物质文化遗产的保护   总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2  

李树林 《图书馆论坛》2008,28(1):144-147

针对非物质文化遗产面临快速消失的严峻形势,民族地区图书馆应责无旁贷承担起保护非物质文化遗产的使命.发挥自身优势,应用现代科技手段,普查采集、保存利用、传播展示非物质文化遗产,实现人类民族文化遗产资源的共享.  相似文献   

非物质文化遗产与图书馆特色馆藏建设   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

彭燕 《河南图书馆学刊》2008,28(4)

非物质文化遗产是人类文明传承的重要组成部分,深受图书馆的重视.非物质文化遗产应用于图书馆中,就是一种特色馆藏.如果结合图书馆本身的特色馆藏开辟非物质文化遗产这一领域,对图书馆特色馆藏的发展将有较大的拓展.  相似文献   

新农村建设背景下的农村文化现状——来自两省一市三县的实地调查   总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2  

张传玉 《江西图书馆学刊》2006,36(4):83-84

根据问卷调查和实地访谈分析了社会主义新农村建设背景下的农村文化现状,并针对存在的一些突出问题提出了相应的政策建议。  相似文献   

中文网络信息资源保存问题探讨     

杨道玲 《档案学研究》2006,89(3)

随着计算机技术的飞速发展,近年来,中文网络信息资源迅速增长,它们是中华文化遗产的一部分,理应得到保存。本文通过对中文网络信息资源保存的意义及其保存现状的分析,揭示中文网络信息资源保存面临的几个主要问题,并提出作者的一点浅见与思考,包括:中文网络信息资源的采集策略、法律、资金、组织与管理机制、中文网络信息档案馆建设等问题。  相似文献   

对图书馆认知的摭谈   总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3  

黄俊贵 《新世纪图书馆》2004,(1):24-28

本文从图书馆文化认知功能的视角，就当前如何正确认识图书馆、“复合图书馆”、“将图书馆搬回家”、“小馆办大事”及“嘉惠士林”等问题，进行了评述。  相似文献   

我国公共图书馆事业建设与文化产业发展   总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3  

杨玉娟 《新世纪图书馆》2005,(6):66-68

论文从文化产业的界定入手，分析了我国文化产业的发展现状，并结合公共图书馆的实际，指出公共图书馆不能市场化，但它将为我国的文化产业发展提供精神动力和智力支持。  相似文献   

Enhancing Research Impact in Heritage Conservation     

Theocharis Katrakazis  Cath Dillon  Petra Juvan  Stavroula Golfomitsou 《文物保护研究》2018,63(8):450-465

This paper examines how research impact is defined, measured, and generated – with a view to understanding how it can be enhanced within heritage conservation. It examines what is meant by ‘impact’ and how it can be promoted within heritage science through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration. Following a general examination of the current discourse concerning research impact, the study examined: (i) active research networks within heritage science; (ii) research planning and evaluation practices within heritage science; and (iii) the experiences of users (i.e. conservators and other heritage professionals) within research collaborations. Terminologies surrounding the notion of impact and the various phases of the research process were reviewed – from the initial identification of a knowledge gap to the eventual application of new findings in practice. Next, the reach and diversity of research collaborations (as identified through publication co-authorship) were studied to characterise the inter-disciplinary nature of heritage science and its connectedness to users. Findings showed substantial growth in international research collaborations over recent years, predominantly involving academic- and research-oriented institutions – although the engagement of heritage institutions has proportionally decreased. In addition, a worldwide survey of institutional planning and evaluation practices revealed a general reliance on processes driven by the interests of researchers – the systematic consideration of stakeholder opinion and evaluation of research outcomes being less common. Finally, a series of semi-structured interviews with senior heritage professionals explored their experience of collaborative research. The results identified key areas where strategic support is needed to promote user participation and enhance impact. These include training for research readiness, engagement, and impact for both researchers and users; better methods for needs and outcome assessment; affordable open access options and greater diversity of knowledge exchange opportunities. Finally, the need for ethical guidelines for responsible research, and greater emphasis on non-academic impact within research rating systems are discussed.  相似文献   

Spread or Sacrifice: Dilemma for Lighting Policies     

Agnes Brokerhof  Pieter Kuiper  Steph Scholten 《文物保护研究》2018,63(5):28-34

ABSTRACT

Light sensitive objects will fade on display. Collection managers and curators face the dilemma whether to spread fading over several similar objects or sacrifice one. This paper describes an experiment in which participants were asked how they would want to pass on a collection of seventeenth century hand-coloured maps to coming generations. Results show that while colour changes are hardly visible, both public and professionals do not perceive them as damage and prefer to spread fading. Once fading becomes clearly visible in all maps, the preference shifts to sacrificing one map. The tipping point lies around five just noticeable changes. This information can be used when selecting objects for exhibition. The outcome also implies it would be prudent to assess the degree of fading of much exhibited objects and consider whether and when to choose for a sacrifice strategy.  相似文献   

Turning a Service Learning Experience into a Model of Student Engagement: The Lighthouse Heritage Research Connections (LHRC) Project in Hong Kong     

Steve H. Ching 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2018,44(2):196-206

The digital shift has provided easy access to academic library users, and yet, the usage of archival collections continues to be low. At the same time, the need for innovation in library services for cultural heritage scholarship and its advancement is emerging. This paper outlines a library-led service-learning program that connects students with lighthouse artifacts, archival collections, scholars in global academia, and wider communities. Student engagement cases are provided to illustrate the way in which the librarian utilizes the Framework of Information Literacy for Higher Education by ACRL to work closely with students. These cases also demonstrate how students can contribute to knowledge creation and preservation efforts for a specific cultural heritage topic that is not static, but which keeps receiving new contributions or additions to the depository. Thus, this paper is an answer to the ACRL's call for pilot projects to be assessed and shared with the wider community of academic librarians and support staff. It also builds on emerging roles for academic libraries like engaged learning. Librarians must move beyond simply seeing themselves as partners. Instead, librarians should see themselves as prime facilitators that co-create and co-develop cultural heritage research and historical projects by connecting actors and resources more effectively than any single actor can do alone.  相似文献