排序方式： 共有72条查询结果，搜索用时 31 毫秒
51.
Jackie Marsh 《English in Education》1998,32(1):10-18
This paper is concerned with how young children as writers perceive the needs of their audience, when that audience is children of the opposite gender. There are documented discussions about what girls and boys like to read and write. Their stories written for girls by boys, and by boys for girls are illustrated and discussed. 相似文献
52.
共同第一作者和作者同等贡献的描述在国外科技期刊中多见,国内期刊中亦有增多趋势,但因此也会带来滥用作者署名权的问题。针对此类问题,认为应主张在接受投稿时就引入作者关于各自贡献的陈述,这有利于审稿人、编者、读者甄别作者排名的真实性,监督作者署名权的使用,维护科研工作的严谨性。 相似文献
53.
54.
委托作品在现实中是关系复杂的作品。我国现行法律对它的权属问题的规定不明确、不具体,法学界的解释也具较大的随意性。包括委托作品在内的著作权立法,既要借鉴国外著作权法普遍接受的基本原则,又必须顾及我国的基本国情。立足我国委托作品著作权保护的立法现状,借鉴国外相关立法经验,委托作品的著作权保护立法,可以"独立合同说"为基本取向。 相似文献
55.
56.
陶丽丽 《廊坊师范学院学报》2009,25(3)
经典女性主义文本《简·爱》有着双重文本策略:一方面是女主人公简.爱的成长历程的表层故事,而深层意义上,是另一个女性主义形象疯女人梅森.伯莎所体现的女性灵魂深处所蕴藏的疯狂与叛逆,以及女性在男权社会压抑下不得不妥协的社会现状,揭示了女性作家内心的冲突,从而充分体现了女性作者身份的焦虑。 相似文献
57.
Patti Schifter Caravello 《Public Services Quarterly》2013,9(3-4):141-171
SUMMARY Graduate and professional school students face a variety of academic integrity issues and are sometimes academically dishonest. The author surveys the literature of the last decade on graduate student academic integrity, including plagiarism, cheating, falsification, and authorship conflicts, focusing on empirical studies in multiple disciplines, studies that portray issues arising in individual disciplines, and solutions suggested. The author proposes that librarians who serve, teach, and consult with graduate students should develop their instructional role in this area. By becoming aware of the chief academic integrity problems and the subject-discipline related concerns, they can better assist graduate students in the context of information literacy and collaborate with faculty on training and other solutions. 相似文献
58.
《Public Services Quarterly》2013,9(2):15-22
Abstract Well-chosen keywords in titles are significant in enabling optimal document retrieval. Title keyword searches employing the natural language of the researcher augment controlled vocabulary searches. Authors and researchers interested in a particular topic share a vocabulary that contains keywords useful in database searching. It is important for authors to incorporate such keywords in their titles. Both author and researcher will benefit if titles facilitate electronic access. Librarians can assist in educating authors on the benefits of using distinctive and selective keywords in titles by making guidelines available. 相似文献
59.
严云受 《安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2001,29(1):49-57
在对胡适有关《醒世姻缘传》作者问题考证进行补考的基础上，将《醒世姻缘传》与蒲松龄诗文进行比较研究，认为两者在婚姻、家庭问题上有共同的生活体验和思想观念；对农村灾异特征的描写及写作心态相通。《醒世姻缘传》与《聊斋志异》都表现出“志异”的相同审美个性；并对杨复吉《梦阑琐笔》记述的可信性进行考述，进一步证明《醒世姻缘传》的作者是蒲松龄。 相似文献
60.
Hamid R. Jamali David Nicholas Anthony Watkinson Abdullah Abrizah Blanca Rodríguez‐Bravo Cherifa Boukacem‐Zeghmouri Jie Xu Tatiana Polezhaeva Eti Herman Marzena
wigon 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(2):142-152
This article reports on the findings of an international online survey of early career researchers (ECRs) with regard to their authorship and peer review, attitudes, and practices, which sought to discover how the new wave of researchers were utilizing these key aspects of the scholarly communications system. A questionnaire was developed on the back of a 3‐year longitudinal, qualitative study and was distributed through publisher lists, social media networks, university networks, and specialist ECR membership organizations. Identical English, Polish, Russian, Chinese, Spanish, and French versions of the questionnaire were used. Results from 1,600 respondents demonstrated that 82.7% had co‐authored a paper, and most had performed a variety of authorship tasks. Almost half the respondents reported being subject to various authorship policies, although a quarter said they were not aware of any such policies. Almost all Chinese ECRs reported being subject to authorship policies, but only a third of UK ECRs reported the same. Three‐quarters of ECRs had experience in responding to peer review, and half had been peer reviewers. Half the respondents had a good experience of review and viewed it as a valuable way to improve their authorship skills. However, there was some criticism of some shortcoming such as lengthy peer review and superficial or uninformed comments by reviewers. Double‐blind review was the preferred methodology, and there were few suggestions for how to improve the review process. 相似文献