排序方式： 共有211条查询结果，搜索用时 218 毫秒
41.
陈萌 《泉州师范学院学报》2006,24(6):35-38
以基于J2EE工作流体系结构的办公自动化系统为基础,利用推技术发送器实现服务器对客户端的主动刷新,设计了一个支持移动信息设备无线互联进行移动办公的办公自动化系统,该系统对类似应用有较好的参考价值. 相似文献
42.
通达OA后台运行插件程序将列表控件数据转存至后台附加的新数据表;并实现列表控件字段不同经办人的分别写字段权限。 相似文献
43.
Christine Rigda 《Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve》2013,23(2):145-153
The libraries at the University of Toledo manage electronic reserve via Innovative Interfaces product Media Management. This article explores the reasoning behind selecting this software and examines the challenges of installation, maintenance, responding to patron access problems, and providing faculty support. Providing quality service with a small staff is also addressed. 相似文献
44.
李木 《大连教育学院学报》2011,27(1):52-53
委托培训项目是培训机构依靠自身独特的培训产品赢得委托方的青睐而得到的培训项目,在其设计与实施过程中有着特有的工作流程,并在每个流程环节都存在影响项目成效的关键因素。 相似文献
45.
Quan‐Hoang Vuong 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(2):119-130
While researchers with retracted papers – publications that are withdrawn because of significant errors or scientific misconduct – carry a permanent stain on their publishing records, understanding the causes and initiators of such retractions can shed a different light on the matter. This paper, based on a random sample of 2,046 retracted papers, which were published between 1975 and 2019, extracted from Retraction Watch and the websites of major publishers, shows that 53% of the retraction notices do not specify who initiated the retraction. Nearly 10% of the retraction notes either omit or do not contain information related to reasons for retractions. Furthermore, most of the retracted papers in our sample have no limitation section; those who do are commonly unhelpful or irrelevant. The results carry three implications for scientific transparency: retraction notices need to be more informative; limitation sections ought to be a required and even an open section of all published articles; and finally, promoting ‘heroic acts’ in science can positively change the current publishing culture. 相似文献
46.
本文分别从期刊撤稿规范和流程、对作者惩戒措施、研究报告透明度政策等方面深入揭示了国内外生物医学期刊伦理建设现状,并提出国内期刊抵制学术不端行为的防范措施。1)完善撤稿规范和流程,是防范学术不端行为的重要制度保证。2)制订惩戒措施,构建防范学术不端行为的防线。3)增加研究报告透明度,将“把控内容真实性”作为防范学术不端行为的根本:①提高数据、代码、材料透明度,增加对研究结果的信任;②制订图像完整性标准,避免不当操纵;③遵循临床试验报告指南,促进试验结果的完整和透明;④施行临床试验注册相关规范,提高社会公信度;⑤规范利益冲突披露形式,提高研究报告透明度。 相似文献
47.
学术期刊的纠错栏目:勘误·更正·撤稿 总被引：4，自引：2，他引：2
勘误、更正和撤稿是学术期刊的重要栏日.因它们的法律意义不同,产生的原因不同,所以,在刊登主体、内容、栏目安排和编排处理上既有相同之处,又有不同之处,对纠正学术期刊的错误起到重要的作用.这应引起学术期刊编辑的注意. 相似文献
48.
Todd Enoch 《期刊图书馆员》2014,66(1-4):182-188
In 2001, the University of North Texas (UNT) Libraries developed their own electronic resource management (ERM) system to track their online resources and contracts. Over the past decade, the programming and upkeep for the homegrown system had become too much of a burden, and the decision was made to move to a vendor-supported ERM system. In the summer of 2012, UNT began the implementation of Innovative’s ERM module. This presentation covered the steps involved in that implementation and the lessons learned on how best to prepare for a radical shift in workflows and procedures. 相似文献
49.
Shannon Kipphut-Smith 《College & Undergraduate Libraries》2014,21(3-4):279-294
Academic libraries are often tasked with open access (OA) policy implementation. Many academic libraries have developed robust workflows that utilize custom-built management tools and receive support from a number of library staff. While such workflows certainly streamline the process, their development and management require significant resources. As the number of smaller institutions with OA policies increases, there is a need for solutions that are efficient, flexible, and can be accomplished with minimal resources. Staff at Rice University's Fondren Library developed a simple workflow that populates the institutional repository, freeing up time for OA policy outreach and awareness activities. 相似文献
50.
[目的/意义]研究学术文献被撤销的规律和特征对于客观认识撤稿现象、净化学术环境、加强科研诚信建设具有重要价值。当前对于撤稿的研究集中于期刊论文,很少关注会议文献。[方法/过程]以撤稿观察数据库中7579篇被撤销会议文献为研究对象,分析总结被撤销文献的时间、来源和学科分布特征以及被撤销原因和时滞。[结果/结论]会议文献撤稿与期刊论文撤稿在原因和时滞上存在重要差异,中国是会议文献撤稿的“重灾区”。研究认为,科研人员、审稿人、出版商、科研管理机构亟需共同努力,加强对于学术会议的质量控制,提高相关主体行为的规范性。 相似文献