排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1
1.
Pre‐ and post‐word association and achievement tests were administered to relate concept growth with classroom learning. In the secondary school chemistry topic of reaction kinetics no conceptual differences were detected in the pre‐tests between high and low achievers in the achievement tests. In the post‐test the low achievers showed virtually no conceptual changes whereas the high achievers showed clearly relevant conceptual growth and structuring. The key concept collision integrated the concept structure of the high achievers, not appearing at all for the low achievers. The results show the potential of word association tests for use by teachers to follow the learning of concepts during science teaching. 相似文献
2.
Daniel Gil-Pérez Amparo Vilches Isabel Fernández Antonio Cachapuz João Praia Pablo Valdés Julia Salinas 《Science & Education》2005,14(3-5):309-320
The current consideration of technology as ‘applied science’, this is to say, as something that comes ‘after’ science, justifies the lack of attention paid to technology in science education. In our paper we question this simplistic view of the science-technology relationship, historically rooted in the unequal appreciation of intellectual and manual work, and we try to show how the absence of the technological dimension in science education contributes to a naïve and distorted view of science which deeply affects the necessary scientific and technological literacy of all citizens. 相似文献
3.
Gil-Pérez Daniel Guisasola Jenaro Moreno Antonio Cachapuz Antonio Pessoa De Carvalho Anna M. Martínez Torregrosa Joaquín Salinas Julia Valdés Pablo González Eduardo Gené Duch Anna Dumas-Carré Andrée Tricárico Hugo Gallego Rómulo 《Science & Education》2002,11(6):557-571
After an impressive development throughout the last two decades, supported by a greatamount of research and innovation, science education seemed to be becoming a newscientific domain. This transformation of Science Education into a specific field of researchand knowledge is usually associated with the establishment of what has been called anemergent consensus about constructivist positions. However, some voices have begunto question these constructivist positions and therefore the idea of an advancementtowards a coherent body of knowledge in the field of science education. The goalof this work is to analyse some of the current criticisms of the so-called constructivistorientations and to study their implications for the development of science education asa coherent body of knowledge. 相似文献
1