排序方式： 共有7条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Panadero Ernesto Pérez Daniel García Ruiz Javier Fernández Fraile Juan Sánchez-Iglesias Iván Brown Gavin T. L. 《European Journal of Psychology of Education - EJPE》2023,38(3):1031-1051
European Journal of Psychology of Education - This study explores the effects of feedback type, feedback occasion, and year level on student self-assessments in higher education. In total, 126... 相似文献
2.
3.
García-Pérez Daniel Fraile Juan Panadero Ernesto 《European Journal of Psychology of Education - EJPE》2021,36(2):533-550
European Journal of Psychology of Education - This study’s aim was to analyse the decisions higher education students make about learning strategies. We focus on research questions related to... 相似文献
4.
Victor M. López-Pastor María L. Santos Pastor Antonio Fraile Aranda 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2012,37(4):453-464
This study was undertaken at three teacher education programmes and was designed to determine the following within each programme: (1) the reliability correlations among students’ self‐grade (SSG), the grade granted by the professor (PG) and the negotiated final grade (NFG); (2) the range and frequency of grade differences between SSG and PG; and (3) the tendency of the negotiation on NFG as compared to SSG (i.e. NFG > SSG or NFG < SSG), when SSG was not equal to PG. The samples were made up of three professors and their corresponding student groups (students, n = 100, 34 and 53, respectively), each in a different teacher education programme. The results show that there was a high reliability correlation among SSG, PG and NFG in all three programmes. Furthermore, in these programmes, the grade differences were never higher than 1.5 on a scale of 0 to 10 points; in fact, agreement between DDG and PG was reached 96%, 35.29% and 43.39% of the time), and, when disagreement emerged, it was mainly within a minimum range of 0.1 to 0.5 points. As for the tendency of NFG versus SSG in each programme, slightly higher percentages were obtained for NFG > SSG in Programmes B and C, whereas the opposite (NFG < SSG) was true in Programme A; overall, however, it could be said that both tendencies balanced each other out, being the total percentages in each programme 0%, 41% and 30% for NFG > SSG; and 4%, 23% and 26%, for NFG < SSG, respectively. 相似文献
5.
6.
Lipnevich Anastasiya A. Panadero Ernesto Gjicali Kalina Fraile Juan 《Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability》2021,33(4):675-699
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability - This study examined differences in the assessment criteria used by the USA and Spanish university instructors to assign course grades. The US... 相似文献
7.
Ernesto Panadero Juan Fraile Javier Fernández Ruiz David Castilla-Estévez Miguel A. Ruiz 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2019,44(3):379-397
Classroom assessment is crucial to understand how students approach course materials, even more so in a competitive environment such as higher education. Our aim was to explore the current situation of assessment in higher education to consider further institutional and training actions. Every syllabus from all public universities in Spain was entered into a database, from which 1,693 syllabi were selected completely at random for a content analysis. It was found that: (1) university teachers use a greater variety and number of assessment instruments than did their counterparts of decades ago, (2) final examination score is still the highest-weighted source of information for the final grade, (3) the cluster of assessment practices show that conventional approaches are still the most prevalent ones, (4) formal peer and self-assessment practices are still extremely rare in the classroom, (5) assessment practices barely change between first and fourth-year courses, and (6) most variations in assessment are explained by differences on faculty/academic divisions. This research has implications for European legislation, university regulation and university teacher training programmes. 相似文献
1