排序方式： 共有7条查询结果，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1
1.
In this study, the reading comprehension of deaf children and adolescents in the Netherlands is examined along with their
word identification. The reading comprehension of 464 deaf students and the word identification of 504 deaf students between
6 and 20 years of age was examined. The results show the reading comprehension scores of deaf children to be far below the
scores of hearing children. On average, the deaf subjects scored at a level equivalent to a hearing child in the first grade.
The word identification scores of the deaf children, however, were almost equivalent to the scores of hearing children. Although
reading comprehension and word identification appear to be related, this relation does not completely explain the comprehension
difficulties encountered by deaf children. Additional factors are required to explain deaf children’s difficulties with reading
comprehension. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
The present study examined whether specific item characteristics, such as mode of acquisition (MoA) of word meanings, make reading comprehension tests particularly difficult for deaf children. Reading comprehension data on nearly 13,000 hearing 7-to-12-year-olds and 253 deaf 7-to-20-year-olds were analyzed, divided across test levels from second to sixth grade (not necessarily corresponding to chronological age). Factor analyses across item scores suggested that, of the determinants studied, MoA--referring to the type of information (perceptual, linguistic, or both) used in word meaning acquisition--was the only factor that contributed significantly to deaf and hearing children's reading comprehension. For hearing children, MoA influenced item scores at the third- and fourth-grade levels. For the deaf children, MoA influenced item scores through the sixth-grade level. 相似文献
5.
Grade two through six elementary school Dutch children were asked to perform a lexical decision task including 90 pseudowords constructed by changing one or two letters in a Dutch word. Subsequently, the children were asked about the meaning of pseudowords they had not crossed out and that they, apparently, had considered to be words. Multiple regression analyses on the lexical decision task showed that the older children were more hindered by the morphemic structure of a pseudoword than by its orthographic neighbors. The younger children, in contrast, were less hindered by the morphemic structure of a pseudoword and more hindered by its orthographic neighbors. Word length was a (small) predictor only for grade 6. Moreover, the answers of the children reflected that in their construction of meanings for the pseudowords they were hindered both by the morphemic structure and by the orthographic neighbors of the pseudowords. 相似文献
6.
Wauters LN Tellings AE van Bon WH Mak WM 《Journal of deaf studies and deaf education》2008,13(2):175-192
This article examines the role of mode of acquisition (MoA) of word meanings in reading comprehension: children acquire word meanings using perceptual information (e.g., hearing, seeing, or smelling the referent) and/or linguistic information (e.g., verbal explanations). A total of 72 deaf and 99 hearing children between 7 and 15 years of age performed a self-paced reading task. Comprehension scores increased with age in both groups, but reading speed increased over age only for the hearing participants. For both groups, reading times on linguistically acquired words were longer than on perceptually acquired words. Although deaf children scored lower than hearing children in both conditions, comprehension scores for both groups were lower on linguistic items than on perceptual items. Thus, MoA influences reading comprehension, but the deaf show difficulty on both the perceptual and the linguistic items. 相似文献
7.
The main point of our study was to examine the vocabulary knowledge of pupils in grades 3–6, and in particular the relative
reading vocabulary disadvantage of hearing-impaired pupils. The achievements of 394 pupils with normal hearing and 106 pupils
with a hearing impairment were examined on two vocabulary assessment tasks: a lexical decision task and a use decision task.
The target words in both tasks represent the vocabulary children should have at the end of primary school. The results showed
that most hearing pupils reached this norm, whereas most hearing-impaired pupils did not. In addition, results showed that
hearing-impaired pupils not only knew fewer words, but that they also knew them less well. This lack of deeper knowledge remained
even when matching hearing and hearing-impaired children on minimal word knowledge. Additionally, comparison of the two tasks
demonstrated the efficacy of the lexical decision task as a measure of lexical semantic knowledge. 相似文献
1