首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   35篇
  免费   0篇
教育   29篇
信息传播   6篇
  2007年   2篇
  2006年   1篇
  2005年   1篇
  2003年   1篇
  2001年   1篇
  1996年   2篇
  1995年   3篇
  1994年   1篇
  1993年   1篇
  1992年   1篇
  1991年   4篇
  1989年   3篇
  1988年   2篇
  1987年   2篇
  1986年   2篇
  1985年   1篇
  1984年   1篇
  1983年   1篇
  1982年   1篇
  1981年   1篇
  1979年   1篇
  1962年   1篇
  1956年   1篇
排序方式: 共有35条查询结果,搜索用时 250 毫秒
1.
ABSTRACT Teachers are regularly blamed–especially in times of moral panic–for failing to set a good example and teach proper moral standards to their pupils. As well as familiar issues about moral values and the legitimacy of different modes of moral pedagogy this also raises the question of the degree of connection between a teacher's private and personal values, attitudes and behaviour and his or her professional conduct and responsibilities. Two common responses to these problems–paternalism and liberalism–are here criticised and an alternative perspective on the moral role of the teacher is sought, drawing on communitarian insights into the nature of moral and other values and their function in human affairs.  相似文献   
2.
3.
4.
Philosophy, Methodology and Action Research   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
The aim of this paper is to examine the role of methodology in action research. It begins by showing how, as a form of inquiry concerned with the development of practice, action research is nothing other than a modern 20th century manifestation of the pre-modern tradition of practical philosophy. It then draws in Gadamer's powerful vindication of the contemporary relevance of practical philosophy in order to show how, by embracing the idea of 'methodology', action research functions to sustain a distorted understanding of what practice is. The paper concludes by outlining a non-methodological view of action research whose chief task is to promote the kind of historical self-consciousness that the development of practice presupposes and requires.  相似文献   
5.
This paper takes seriously the claim that postmodernism has seriously undermined our‘modern’ understanding of what the role of education in a democratic society should be. It therefore seeks to reinterpret this role in a way that confronts the challenge that postmodernism has posed. In order to do this the paper clarifies how postmodernism has now discredited the‘modern’ assumptions on which our view of the relationship between education and democracy has been erected. Drawing on the philosophy of John Dewey, it then reconstructs the relationship between education and democracy so as effectively to resist the challenge that postmodernism has posed.  相似文献   
6.
Theories of Theory and Practice   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
  相似文献   
7.
8.
9.
10.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号