首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   117篇
  免费   0篇
教育   70篇
科学研究   1篇
信息传播   46篇
  2021年   1篇
  2019年   2篇
  2013年   6篇
  2011年   1篇
  2010年   1篇
  2009年   1篇
  2007年   5篇
  2006年   2篇
  2003年   4篇
  1999年   1篇
  1998年   3篇
  1997年   3篇
  1996年   3篇
  1995年   4篇
  1994年   2篇
  1993年   1篇
  1992年   6篇
  1991年   3篇
  1990年   3篇
  1989年   5篇
  1988年   6篇
  1987年   9篇
  1986年   5篇
  1985年   1篇
  1984年   3篇
  1983年   3篇
  1982年   3篇
  1981年   3篇
  1980年   2篇
  1979年   2篇
  1978年   2篇
  1977年   3篇
  1976年   1篇
  1975年   1篇
  1974年   3篇
  1973年   3篇
  1972年   3篇
  1971年   2篇
  1970年   1篇
  1969年   1篇
  1968年   1篇
  1967年   1篇
  1959年   1篇
排序方式: 共有117条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
The distinguished US philosopher Elizabeth Anderson, who teaches at the University of Michigan, answers questions put to her by John White about educational aspects of her work in moral and political philosophy. She begins by describing her indebtedness to Dewey in his views on developing students’ capacities for intelligent enquiry and as citizens in a democracy. She elaborates on this in her emphasis on children learning fraternally together with others of diverse class, racial and ethnic backgrounds. She also discusses the control of education, looking at the role of the state and other political authorities in education, the charter school movement and home schooling. Well‐known for her views on democratic equality (as distinct from equality of fortune) and on an adequacy criterion of fairness, she shows how these ideas apply to education for a democratic society. This takes her into critical discussions of equality of educational opportunity, education as a positional good, and the rich variety of educational aims fitting a democracy of equals. Anderson has also written about the errors of theistic religion as well as two award‐winning recent books on the imperative of social integration and on the authoritarian powers of employers. Developing these thoughts in an educational direction, she writes here about religious and moral education, problems with assimilationist and multicultural approaches to schooling, and preparation for work as an educational aim.  相似文献   
2.
3.
4.
This introductory article first gives a brief overview of the articles in the remainder of this special issue. It then considers what we can learn about the comprehensive ideal, and what questions still remain about it, from the treatment it receives in these articles. After an initial discussion of the nature of the common school, two dimensions are identified in which interpretations of the comprehensive ideal often differ: how fully the content of such schooling is filled in, and what its scope is considered to be. Six categories of values are identified to which arguments both for and against the comprehensive ideal may appeal: educational values; values of community; justice and equality; respect; freedom; and non-discrimination. It is suggested that in a context of value-pluralism there can be no canonical interpretation of the comprehensive ideal.  相似文献   
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号