排序方式： 共有7条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
2.
3.
E J McKinin 《Bulletin of the Medical Library Association》1987,75(4):362-365
A method for using a CATLINE SDI (selected dissemination of information) as a current awareness and collection development tool for the health sciences reference department is described. This paper reports three years of experience with this service in an academic health sciences library. It emphasizes the exploitation of four data elements in the CATLINE file: the Abstracting and Indexing Tag (AI) Data Element; the Shelving Location (SL) Data Element; the MeSH Heading (MH) Data Element; the Subheading Qualifier (SH) Data Element. 相似文献
4.
Experienced searchers can help their patrons find the "best" by employing any of several techniques which might filter search results. Using a sample search on Alzheimer's Disease, this article describes and illustrates the following five objective indicators which might be considered signs of quality: methodological rigor, document attributes, peer review, journal reputation, and filtering at input. Sample techniques and results are presented for six databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SAMM, CCML, and JWAT. Understanding of the patron's need and knowledge of the structure and contents of the database will determine when each should be applied to search results. 相似文献
5.
6.
The authors ask whether full-text versions of medical journals are available for searching sooner than their biblographic counterparts. The journals in question are those found in the Comprehensive Core Medical Library (CCML) from BRS Information Technologies and in Mead Data Central's MEDIS Current Journal Files. All journals in these two files are full-text, and neither file contains any indexing features. Update schedules for the full-text version of the MEDLINE journals in each of these files were compared with the most recent issue available in the National Library of Medicine's (NLM) MEDLINE on five different dates. The data revealed substantial fluctuation in comparative currency for MEDIS/MEDLINE over the period of the test. On the date of the last snapshot, June 8, 1990, MEDLINE and MEDIS were offering the same currency for 43% of the journals, and MEDIS was providing first access to 29% of the titles. The CCML/MEDLINE comparison showed less variation. In the last snapshot MEDLINE and CCML were providing access to the same issue for 36% of the journals, and CCML was offering first access to 14%. Prior to publication, this paper was submitted to all three vendors for comment. Significant portions of their responses are quoted. 相似文献
7.
1