排序方式： 共有3条查询结果，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1
1.
Deborah K. Reed Emily Jemison Jessica Sidler-Folsom Ashley Weber 《Journal of Experimental Education》2013,81(4):552-574
This study investigated the content learning of fourth graders (N?=?92) randomly assigned to complete electronic Frayer Models on life science vocabulary by themselves or while engaging in synchronous online discussions with a partner. The use of the graphic organizers was interspersed with other science activities. After seven weeks, all students significantly improved their science content knowledge (d ≈ 0.60), but the two treatment groups did not demonstrate significantly different performance after controlling for pretest abilities. Path analysis revealed the rubric scores on students' organizers were more strongly predictive of the posttest science benchmark in the online discussion group than the independent group, suggesting that collaboratively completing Frayer Models may help bolster the relationship between reading and science. 相似文献
2.
Deborah K Reed Kelly Binning Emily A. Jemison Nicole DeSalle 《Learning disabilities research & practice》2023,38(1):70-79
Increased expectations for writing performance have created a need for formative writing assessments that will help middle school teachers better understand adolescents’ grade-appropriate writing skills and monitor the progress of students with or at risk for writing disabilities. In this practice piece, we first explain research-based recommendations for high-quality writing prompts that are interesting to students, provide clear directions, and ensure accessibility and fairness. Then, we use lessons learned from working with adolescents in Tier 2 literacy intervention classes to demonstrate how teachers can apply the recommendations to identify or develop prompts that will encourage students to write responses. In addition, we explain how analytic rubrics may be used to evaluate responses as a means of informing instruction and further refining the prompts. 相似文献
3.
Sabrina J. Ashwell Patricia K. Baskin Stacy L. Christiansen Sara A. DiBari Annette Flanagin Tracy Frey Racquel Jemison Mia Ricci 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(1):94-99
- Inclusive language will make scholarly publishing more accurate and more respectful, and it has the potential to help authors reach a wider audience.
- JAMA and the JAMA Network journals, the American Chemical Society and the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications have free guides on inclusive language, formatting and images.
- The guides provide principles and rationale, as well as examples of preferred language, in order to equip people with knowledge to choose the most inclusive words even as terminology preferences change.
1