| 国际土地争夺影响效应研究述评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王明珠,赵文武,房学宁.国际土地争夺影响效应研究述评[J].资源科学,2015,37(2):219-225. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王明珠 赵文武 房学宁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京100875;北京师范大学资源学院, 北京100875,北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京100875;北京师范大学资源学院, 北京100875,北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京100875;北京师范大学资源学院, 北京100875 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于Web of Science期刊数据库,本文对土地争夺影响效应相关研究文献进行统计分析,结果显示,非洲作为被投资的主要对象亦是相关研究的热点区域;除非洲外,其它研究热点地区还包括亚洲、拉丁美洲等;对投资者影响的研究则更多是从全球宏观角度展开。在此基础上,从社会、经济、环境及政治四方面具体分析土地争夺的影响效应,发现土地争夺损害被投资区域当地居民权益的现象时有发生,完善被投资国土地管理制度对于解决这一问题至关重要;土地争夺是否会促进经济增长存在争议,特别是对被投资者经济发展的影响;土地争夺过程中存在潜在的破坏环境的风险;土地争夺中的诸多问题使全球的政治形势更加复杂。综合来看,未来土地争夺中产生的土地管理问题、生态环境效应会成为新的研究热点;在全球政治形势复杂多变的宏观背景下,土地争夺对国际关系与社会秩序的影响会得到持续关注;此外,在土地交易透明程度不断增加的基础上,定量化研究不足的现状将得到改善。作为国际土地争夺的投资者与被投资者,我国需要拓展土地争夺研究的国际化视野,推进国际比较研究。
|
| 关 键 词： | 土地争夺 土地交易 影响效应 述评 |
Review of the international land grabbing effect |
| |
| WANG Mingzhu,ZHAO Wenwu and FANG Xuening.Review of the international land grabbing effect[J].Resources Science,2015,37(2):219-225. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Mingzhu ZHAO Wenwu and FANG Xuening |
| |
| Institution: | State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;Beijing Normal University, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing 100875, China,State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;Beijing Normal University, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing 100875, China and State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;Beijing Normal University, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing 100875, China |
| |
| Abstract: | This review is based on the Web of Science database. We chose "land grab", "land rush", and "Foreign Direct Investment in land"as searchable keywords to analyze the international land grabbing effect. We found that the number of land grab articles has increased quickly since 2008;Africa was the biggest hotspot, and then Asia and Latin America. Valid studies showed that local livelihoods, employment, agriculture, food security prospects, international relations, economies, water resources, and technology transfer were the main research themes. We divided these themes into four effects:social effects, economic effects, environmental effects and political effects. We found that land grabs usually harmed local rights and interests, and land management was an effective method to this issue. Effects on the economy were rife with controversy, especially effects on host countries'economies. The process of land grabs may damage the local environment. These issues have made international political and social relations more complicated. In the future, how to enhance host land management, improve ecological and environmental effects, and maintain good international relations will be hot topics as global political relations become more chaotic and unpredictable. Additionally, quantitative studies will increase as opaque transactions decrease. As an investor, China should sufficiently analyze land grabbing effects domestically and on host countries to avoid potential conflicts with other countries;on the other hand, as a host country, China should make sure there are positive effects on local livelihoods, food security, economies and environment. All in all, more research on international land grabs is needed to react to different international voices on this issue. |
| |
| Keywords: | land grabbing land deals effect review |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《资源科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《资源科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
