首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

让科学回归真实--对两种科学模型的一些思考
引用本文:苏湛.让科学回归真实--对两种科学模型的一些思考[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):304-309.
作者姓名:苏湛
作者单位:北京师范大学哲学与社会学学院,北京,100875
摘    要:罗伯特·金·默顿最早对科学建制以及科学与社会间的相互作用做出了系统描述,所得出的默顿规范一直被奉为科学社会学的经典。随着科学的发展,今日科学逐渐显露出一些与默顿模型有所背离的征兆,由此产生了对科学的某种“信任危机”。约翰·齐曼等默顿之后的科学社会学家具体研究了今日科学的社会运行,提出了后学院科学模型,就默顿规范在新时代的新内涵和科学的信任危机作出了某种解释。我们将看到,后学院科学模型是在新情况下对默顿学院科学模型的合理修正。

关 键 词:科学知识社会学  科学模型  默顿  后学院科学
文章编号:1003-2053(2005)03-0304-06

Take science back to real: thinking of the two models of science
SU Zhan.Take science back to real: thinking of the two models of science[J].Studies in Science of Science,2005,23(3):304-309.
Authors:SU Zhan
Abstract:Robert King Merton was the first who described systematically the organizational system of science and the interaction between science and society. He offered the Mertonian norms that were still believed as the golden rule of the sociology of science. Since science’s developing, today’s science begins to seem different to Mertonian model of science, so there is some “crisis of belief” to the science coming out. After Merton, John Ziman and other sociologist of science researched specifically the working of today’s science in the society, and offered the model of post-academic science to explain the crisis of belief to the science and the new meaning of the Mertonian norms in the new age. It will be see that the model of post-academic science is a reasonable amendment to the Mertonian model of academic science in the new condition.
Keywords:sociology of scientific knowledge  model of science  Merton  postacademic science  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号