| 论侵权行为法律效果之规制模式 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 安调珍.论侵权行为法律效果之规制模式[J].安徽广播电视大学学报,2013(3):23-26. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 安调珍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 青海广播电视大学开放教育学院,西宁,810008 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 各立法例对于侵权行为法律效果的规制模式的不同选择,与其各自对债务与责任之关系的理解密切相关。民事责任是对民事法律关系的保障,这种保障功能有历时性的、两个层次的表现形式。债的模式侵权法在逻辑上和价值上都较之于责任模式具有优益性。我国应当坚持传统的债的模式侵权法,与绝对权、请求权制度一道共同构成民事权利保护的二元结构。
|
| 关 键 词： | 侵权行为 法律效果 规制模式 债务 民事责任 |
On Regulatory Patterns of Legal Effects of Torts |
| |
| AN Tiao-zhen.On Regulatory Patterns of Legal Effects of Torts[J].Journal of Anhui Television University,2013(3):23-26. |
| |
| Authors: | AN Tiao-zhen |
| |
| Institution: | AN Tiao-zhen (Open Institute, Oinghai Radio and TV University, Xining 810008,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Different legislations choices of regulatory pattern of legal effects of torts are closely related with their different understandings of the relationship between obligation and liability. Civil liability functions to guarantee civil legal relationship, and this function is diachronic and exhibits in two-tier form. Compared with liability-pattern, torts law with obligation-pattern takes on superiority both in logic and in value. China should adopt the traditional obligation-pattern torts law which goes together with imperium claim to form dual-structure protecting civil rights. |
| |
| Keywords: | tort legal effect regulatory pattern obligation civil liability |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
