首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

测谎结论作为民事诉讼证据之否定性探究
引用本文:叶蔚然.测谎结论作为民事诉讼证据之否定性探究[J].安徽广播电视大学学报,2013(3):27-30,41.
作者姓名:叶蔚然
作者单位:华东政法大学,上海,200042
摘    要:伴随科学技术的突飞猛进,DNA、测谎、痕迹学等现代技术越来越多地被运用在法律领域。其中,测谎技术在我国民事诉讼领域由于缺乏相关法律规定,其运用也在不同的地区呈现不同的态势。做为一项不成熟且并不能保证正确率的发展中技术,测谎结论不具备最基本的证据资格,即使"有限"采用,也不利于法官心证的形成,不利于保护案件当事人最基本的诉讼权利,并对我国当前的民事诉讼规则具有破坏性。

关 键 词:测谎  民事诉讼  证据学

Research on the Negativity of Using Polygraph Test Conclusion in Civil Proceedings
YE Wei-ran.Research on the Negativity of Using Polygraph Test Conclusion in Civil Proceedings[J].Journal of Anhui Television University,2013(3):27-30,41.
Authors:YE Wei-ran
Institution:YE Wei-ran (East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042,China)
Abstract:With the development of science and technology, modern technologies such as DNA and trace have been increasingly applied in the field of law. Because of the lack of relevant laws and regulations of using polygraph test in the field of civil proceedings, the admissibility of it varies in different places. As an immature and inaccurate technology which is still developing, polygraph test conclusion does not have the qualification as evidence. It deviates judges evaluation of evidence even used in a limited sense. It is against the litigants' protection of their basic procedural right. It is also harmful for our country to protect the rules of civil proceedings.
Keywords:polygraph test  civil proceedings  the science of evidence
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号