首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

国外体育行动研究的萌发、践行及启示
引用本文:邓君瑜,熊欢.国外体育行动研究的萌发、践行及启示[J].北京体育大学学报,2018,41(10):46-54.
作者姓名:邓君瑜  熊欢
作者单位:华南师范大学体育科学学院,广东 广州 510006,华南师范大学体育科学学院,广东 广州 510006
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:17BTY048);国家体育总局哲学社会科学研究项目(项目编号:2338SS16075)。通信作者:熊欢。
摘    要:摘要:理论自信指导实践创新是体育研究的内生要求。然而目前我国体育研究大多面临着理论探索与应用实践相脱离的问题,缺乏“行动”的力量。在文献资料法的基础上,试图通过对国内尚未盛行的研究路径——体育行动研究范式的理论渊源、方法论基础及其在国外体育研究实践现状的梳理与分析,找出跨越理论-实践“鸿沟”的路径。研究表明:国外体育行动研究范式可溯源至建构主义理论和批判理论,以实践认识论为基础,在方法论上突出了反思理性和认知旨趣,并由此经历了“理性社会管理”“反实证主义”和“社会变革”三大阶段的流变形态,形成了“体育管理评估的行动研究”“体育从业者专业化发展的行动研究”“体育教学的行动研究”“亚文化群体的体育行动研究”四大研究实践领域。国外经验表明,体育行动研究不仅对体育实践中的问题有具体的解决方案和行动力量,还有利于体育源生理论的产生,是架起体育理论与实践的桥梁。行动研究在国外的应用与实践经验,也为我国体育研究提供了一定的启示和参考,能够在方法论层面为解决我国体育领域现实问题作出贡献。

关 键 词:关键词:行动研究  体育人文社会学  社会理论  研究范式  方法论  研究实践
收稿时间:2017/6/1 0:00:00

Sprouting, Practice and Inspirations of Foreign Sports Action Research Paradigm
DENG Jun-yu and XIONG Huan.Sprouting, Practice and Inspirations of Foreign Sports Action Research Paradigm[J].Journal of Beijing Sport University,2018,41(10):46-54.
Authors:DENG Jun-yu and XIONG Huan
Institution:School of Physical Education, South China Normal University, Gangzhou 510006, Guangdong China and School of Physical Education, South China Normal University, Gangzhou 510006, Guangdong China
Abstract:Abstract: Theoretical confidence guiding practice innovation is the endogenous requirements of sports research. However, at present, most of the sports research in China is facing the problem that the theoretical exploration is separated from the practical application, lacking the strength of "action". Based on the method of literature review, this study attempted to find a way to bridge the gap between theory and practice by sorting out and analyzing the theoretical origin, methodological basis and practice of sports action research paradigm, which is not yet prevalent in China. The research shows that: The paradigm of sports action research abroad can be traced back to constructivism theory and critical theory. On the basis of practical epistemology, It highlights the rational and cognitive purport in methodology. It has gone through the three stages of "rational social management", "anti-positivism" and "social change", and has formed four practical research fields: the action research of sports management evaluation, the action research of professional development of sports practitioners, the action research of sports teaching and the sports action research of sub-cultural groups. Foreign experience shows that sports action research not only has specific solutions and motive force to the problems in sports practice, but also is conducive to the emergence of the theory of sports origin and physiology. It is a bridge between sports theory and practice. The application and practical experience of action research in foreign countries also provide some enlightenment and reference for sports research in China, and can contribute to the solution of practical problems in the field of sports in China on the methodological level.
Keywords:Keywords: action research  sports social science and humanities  social theories  research paradigm  methodology  research practice
点击此处可从《北京体育大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京体育大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号