首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

合理运用评价工具提高高校科研管理水平
引用本文:祝瑞,李辉.合理运用评价工具提高高校科研管理水平[J].高校教育管理,2007,1(6):68-71.
作者姓名:祝瑞  李辉
作者单位:解放军空军工程大学,理学院,陕西,西安,710030
摘    要:《科学引文索引》(SCI)、《工程索引》(EI)、《科技会议录索引》(ISTP)和《中国科技论文统计与引文分析数据库》(CSTPC)是国际上广泛承认的、比较权威和相对客观的科研成果评价工具.它们在科研资源配置、成果量化和人才培养方面具有积极作用,但在其评价过程中也存在重视文章数量而忽略文章引用率等缺点.为此,高校科研成果评价应坚持各学科间同类相比;注重质量评估;将SCI、EI、ISTP纳入我国的科研综合评价体系,并构建和完善适应我国的独立科研成果评价体系,以此来提高高校科研管理水平.

关 键 词:科学成果  评价工具  高校  科研管理  合理运用  评价工具  高校科研  科研管理  水平  Management  Scientific  Research  Improve  Systems  Assessing  成果评价体系  适应  构建和完善  综合  质量评估  类相  学科  引用率  存在  评价过程
文章编号:1673-8381(2007)06-0068-04
修稿时间:2007-09-18

Making Proper Use of Assessing Systems to Improve Scientific Research Management
ZHU Rui,LI Hui.Making Proper Use of Assessing Systems to Improve Scientific Research Management[J].Journal of higher Education Management,2007,1(6):68-71.
Authors:ZHU Rui  LI Hui
Abstract:SCI, EI, ISTP, and CSTPC are widely accepted as objective criteria for assessing scientific research in universities. This paper introduces the features of SCI, EI, ISTP, and CSTPC, points out the functions they play in allocating scientific research resources, quantifying scientific achievements and producing talents and their weaknesses such as overemphasizing the quantity and neglecting the citation rate, and finally offers some Suggestions as to how to construct an adequate assessing system in China so as to improve scientific research management in universities.
Keywords:assessing scientific research  tool  institutions of higher learning  scientific research management
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号