| 《孟子》引《书》二例考论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 梅显懋,贾清宇.《孟子》引《书》二例考论[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2010,33(4):97-100. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 梅显懋 贾清宇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 辽宁师范大学历史文化旅游学院,辽宁,大连,116029 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 阎若璩为代表的学者以《古文尚书》原文与《孟子》引《书》之文不同为伪迹。但是，《孟子》引《书》存在改动加工情况。《孟子》的《梁惠王下》和《滕文公下》两篇对《古文尚书》的《泰誓上》和《武成》的两例征引，便是孟子为圆己说有意改动的结果，不能以此作为《古文尚书》造伪的证据。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《孟子》 《古文尚书》 引文 有意改动 |
The Textual Criticism of Two Instances about Mencius Quotating Ancient Book of History |
| |
| MEI Xian-mao,JIA Qing-yu.The Textual Criticism of Two Instances about Mencius Quotating Ancient Book of History[J].Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition),2010,33(4):97-100. |
| |
| Authors: | MEI Xian-mao JIA Qing-yu |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Historical Culture and Tourism, Liaoning Normal University , Dalian 116029 ,China ) |
| |
| Abstract: | Academians with Yan Ruo-qu as representative believe that the differences between the originals of Ancient Book of History and the quotations of Mencius are the evidences of forgery. But Mencius has modified what it quoted from the Ancient Book of History. There are two instances of quotations： LiangHuiwang Part Ⅱ and TengWengong Part Ⅲ in Mencius referred to Taishi（Part Ⅰ ） and WuCheng in Ancient Book of History, which are the results of Mencius consciously modifying in order to support his own words and cannot be regarded as the evidences that Ancient Book of History was forged. |
| |
| Keywords: | Mencius Ancient Book of History quotation conscious modification |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
