| 浅析行政程序之职能分离制度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高寒.浅析行政程序之职能分离制度[J].哈尔滨学院学报,2012,33(1):48-52. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高寒 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学法学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 职能分离制度是自然公正原则中＂自己不能作为自己案件的法官＂的具体体现。职能分离制度最早产生于司法领域,随着行政权的扩张,在行政领域得到了发展。我国现行实定法中关于职能分离制度的规定较简单笼统,而最能体现职能分离的听证主持人制度,也存在类似缺陷,应从法律上加强,并辅以相应的配套措施。
|
| 关 键 词： | 职能分离 行政处罚 听证主持人 “行政三分制” |
Function Division in Administrative Procedures |
| |
| GAO Han.Function Division in Administrative Procedures[J].Journal of Harbin University,2012,33(1):48-52. |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Han |
| |
| Institution: | GAO Han(China University of Political Science and Laws,Beijing 100088,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Function division is the realization of the principle of natural justice,which originated in the judicial domain and later developed to the administrative domain.The items of function division in China’s current law are too general and simple and there is similar flaw in the hosting system of hearing of witness.It is proposed to develop more effective law with corresponding measures. |
| |
| Keywords: | function division administrative penalty host of hearing of witness three-division administration system |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《哈尔滨学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
