| 侦查取证环节询问被害人的程序规制——基于新《刑事诉讼法》文本的解读 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何静.侦查取证环节询问被害人的程序规制——基于新《刑事诉讼法》文本的解读[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,39(5):100-103. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何静 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京农业大学工学院,江苏南京,210031 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(08SFB2029) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 强制询问被害人是侦查机关较为倚重的一种侦查取证措施,对于侦查取证效率的提高大有裨益,也得到了刑事诉讼法律的认可从而具有合法性.不过,强制询问潜藏着较大的侵权风险,可能对被害人的自由权、身体健康权、休息权以及生活安宁权构成妨害.现行立法既未对任意询问与强制询问作合理区分,强制询问可以任意启动；另一方面,询问被害人的操作规则较为粗陋,而且针对被害人的制裁与保护机制缺失,不利于被害人权利的保障,因此有必要作出针对性的改革.
|
| 关 键 词： | 侦查取证 询问 被害人 程序规制 |
Procedural Regulation about Questioning a victim in the Investigation and Forensics links |
| |
| HE Jing.Procedural Regulation about Questioning a victim in the Investigation and Forensics links[J].Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2012,39(5):100-103. |
| |
| Authors: | HE Jing |
| |
| Institution: | HE Jing(Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210031,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Compulsory questioning of a victim is more reliance an investigation and evidence collection measures to the investigating organ,hasing great benefit to the efficiency of investigation and evidence collection,has also been recognized by the criminal procedure law therefore has legitimacy.However,there is a greater risk of infringement,may prejudice the victim’s right of freedom,good health,rest and living peace.Current legislation is neither any reasonable distinction between forced and random asking,forced inquiry can be started freely;on the other hand,the operating rules of questioning a victim are relatively crude,and the sanctions and protection victims’ mechanisms is missing,not conducive to the victims’ rights protection,therefore it is necessary to make targeted reforms. |
| |
| Keywords: | Investigation and Forensics Questioning victim Procedural Regulation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
