| 郑樵与阮冈纳赞的知识组织思想 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李超民.郑樵与阮冈纳赞的知识组织思想[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(1):73. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李超民 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海财经大学图书馆 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 上海市图书馆学会重点研究课题"数字环境下(纸本)馆藏质量测评与藏书策略" |
| |
| 摘 要： | 研究我国南宋郑樵的校雠理论和当代印度阮冈纳赞的分面理论的科学内涵及理论价值。郑樵知识组织思想既重视发现知识源头及组织分类保存,也重视在现存知识体系中为丢失的知识留下合理位置,还重视对以往知识进行专业化发掘与整理,以便于知识组织的完整和传承。阮冈纳赞注重继承和保存现有民族知识,注重为新知识在现行组织体系中预留位置,还注重推动知识组织理论现代化。
|
| 关 键 词： | 东方学派 知识组织理论 郑樵 阮冈纳赞 |
| 收稿时间： | 2012-08-13 |
Knowledge Organization Thought of Zheng Qiao and S.R.Ranganathan |
| |
| Li Chaomin.Knowledge Organization Thought of Zheng Qiao and S.R.Ranganathan[J].Library and Information Service,2013,57(1):73. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Chaomin |
| |
| Institution: | Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Library, Shanghai 200433 |
| |
| Abstract: | Taking the contributions of oriental school in KO system thought as center, this paper studies the scientific factors and theoretical values of Jiaochoulue of Zheng Qiao in southern Song dynasty and facet thought of Ranganathan in modern India. Zheng Qiao’s KO thought not only emphasizes to find the origins of ancient knowledge and classify them into the ethnical knowledge system, but to leave space in the existing knowledge organization to locate lost knowledge in history. Zheng Qiao also stresses to collect and organize ancient knowledge to guarantee the completeness and inheritance. While as for Ranganathan, his library theory emphasizes the Indic tradition of knowledge, his classification with elastic marking system leaves adequate space for new knowledge to be organized, and advances the new development of modern KO theories. It is concluded that ethnical KO thought must be thoroughly studied. |
| |
| Keywords: | Oriental School theory of knowledge organization Zheng Qiao S R Ranganathan |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
