首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

领域演化结构识别的主路径方法与高被引论文方法对比研究
引用本文:韩毅,童迎,夏慧.领域演化结构识别的主路径方法与高被引论文方法对比研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(3):11-16.
作者姓名:韩毅  童迎  夏慧
作者单位:西南大学计算机与信息科学学院
基金项目:《图书情报工作》杂志社出版基金项目"基于引文网络主路径的领域演化结构识别研究",西南大学科技基金资助项目"基于引文网络主路径的学科演化结构识别与演化动力学机制研究"
摘    要:高被引论文方法通过节点相似性聚类来反映领域演化结构,而主路径方法则通过节点连通性来揭示领域演化结构。在分析两种方法差异的基础上,以富勒烯领域引文数据为样本,应用HistciteTM和Pajek对比研究主路径组分完全网络和相同数量顶点的高被引论文网络,结果表明二者的结构与组分差异显著。主路径组分的当年引用数排序的结果表明,多数路径组分不完全是当年的高被引论文,进而证明了主路径分析方法的独特性。

关 键 词:主路径分析  高被引论文聚类  领域演化结构  HistCiteTM  Pajek  
收稿时间:2012-10-15

Comparative Study of Main Path Analysis and Highly-cited-paper Clustering to Identify Domain Evolving Structure
Han Yi,Tong Ying,Xia Hui.Comparative Study of Main Path Analysis and Highly-cited-paper Clustering to Identify Domain Evolving Structure[J].Library and Information Service,2013,57(3):11-16.
Authors:Han Yi  Tong Ying  Xia Hui
Institution:College of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
Abstract:Highly cited papers method is commonly used to reflect the domain evolving structure by calculating the node similarity, while the main path analysis reflects the domain evolving structure by calculating the node connectivity. Based on the differences between these two methods and taking fullerene citation data as the sample, this paper comparatively studies the complete network of main path component and highly-cited-paper network of same number vertex with Pajek and HistCiteTM. The result shows that the network structure and components are significantly different between of them. Furthermore, the cited counts of the main path node every year reveal that most path components are not completely the highly-cited papers and that the method of main path analysis is unique.
Keywords:main path analysis  highly-cited-paper clustering  domain evolving structure  HistCiteTM  Pajek  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号