| 关于“文章学”与“文学批评”的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 汪春泓.关于“文章学”与“文学批评”的思考[J].湘南学院学报,2004,25(3):31-36. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 汪春泓 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学,中文系,北京,100871 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从文献学、古代文学理论方面考察,现代"文学批评"与古代"文章学"歧异分明。郭绍虞等囿于所处时代环境,以"文章"非"文学"的先行观念为主导,试图在"文章"中清理出一种纯粹的"文学"概念,实则是不能完全成立的。实事求是地还"文章学"、"文学批评"以本来面目,是中国现代学术重建的首要工作。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文章学 文学批评 学术重建 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-8173(2004)03-0031-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年3月2日 |
On "Articlology" and "Literary Criticism" |
| |
| WANG Chun-hong.On "Articlology" and "Literary Criticism"[J].Journal of Xiangnan University,2004,25(3):31-36. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Chun-hong |
| |
| Abstract: | According to the observation of philology and the ancient literary theories, the author finds out that the modern "literary criticism" differs greatly from the ancient "articlology". Guo Shao-yu, restrained by the time he lived, took a supposed-to-be idea of rendering "article" into 'non-literature" in the hope of clearing out some pure "literature" from "articles", which finds no foundations. It is the primary work of the re-construction of the modern Chinese academic world to give a faithful recognition of "articlology" and "literary criticism". |
| |
| Keywords: | articlology literary criticism re-construction of academic |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
