| 论高校教师教学的360度绩效评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 向俊杰,陈威.论高校教师教学的360度绩效评价[J].黑龙江高教研究,2020(1):59-64. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 向俊杰 陈威 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 桂林理工大学,广西桂林541004,桂林理工大学,广西桂林541004 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 广西学位与研究生教育改革课题“提升民族地区基层公务员队伍素质和政府治理能力的地方院校MPA培养模式研究”;广西教育科学规划项目“‘双一流’建设背景下广西高校人才竞争力提升路径研究” |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自21世纪以来,我国绝大多数高校在教师教学方面实现了不同形式的360度绩效评价,但是效果并不佳。问题主要在于评价主体的外行化及其与被评价者的合谋、评价指标没有突出教学内容的重要性、忽视教师教学的绩效改进,其原因在于"水土不服"的评价环境、教学与科研的割裂、教学内容与人才培养目的的割裂和管理人员的懒政,其解决之道在于营造有利的评价环境、教学评价与科研评价相结合、教学评价与长期人才质量评价相结合、规范评价过程。
|
| 关 键 词： | 教学 360度绩效评价 绩效评价 |
On All-dimensional Evaluation of College Teachers' Teaching Performance |
| |
| XIANG Jun-jie,CHEN Wei.On All-dimensional Evaluation of College Teachers' Teaching Performance[J].Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education,2020(1):59-64. |
| |
| Authors: | XIANG Jun-jie CHEN Wei |
| |
| Institution: | (Guilin University of Technology,Guilin 541004,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Different forms of all-dimensional performance evaluation has been applied to teaching in universities since the 21st century,but it doesn't work well.The problems are unprofessional appraisers,their conspiracy with the assessee,the underrated con・tent of courses and the neglected performance improvements in teaching.The reasons are that the appraising environment isn't suitable to all-dimensional performance evaluation,that the teaching in universities is separated from the scientific research,that the teaching content breaks away from the goal of personnel training and that administrative staffs are lazy.The measures to the problems are to shape the appraising environment,combine the teaching evaluation with scientific research appraisement and the teaching content appraisement with personnel quality evaluation,and normalize evaluation process. |
| |
| Keywords: | teaching all-dimensional performance evaluation performance appraising |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
