| 关于圣愚文化与俄罗斯文学的对话 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王志耕,孙海英.关于圣愚文化与俄罗斯文学的对话[J].廊坊师范学院学报,2013(3):5-10. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王志耕 孙海英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南开大学文学院,天津300071 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 圣愚文化是俄罗斯宗教文化中的重要组成部分,它固有的＂疯癫与虔诚＂的双重性品格影响了俄罗斯文学的＂肯定性＂与＂否定性＂内容,如对永恒救赎的肯定、对世俗权力的否定等;同时也对其文学形式发生着结构性作用,如审美满足的延迟处理、自我指涉性的嘲讽以及微观叙事形态下的宏大叙事风格。圣愚文化对俄罗斯文学的影响中介是受到圣愚文化陶冶的俄罗斯民族性及其代表人物——作家群体。因此,对这些复杂关系的研究将能更好地发掘出俄罗斯文学经典的普世意义和审美价值,并对我们本土文化的建设提供一种参照系统。
|
| 关 键 词： | 圣愚文化 俄罗斯文学 俄罗斯民族性 疯癫与虔诚 |
Foolishness-for-Christ Culture and Russian Literature |
| |
| WANG Zhi-geng,SUN Hai-ying.Foolishness-for-Christ Culture and Russian Literature[J].Journal of Langfang Teachers College,2013(3):5-10. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Zhi-geng SUN Hai-ying |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Literature, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Foolishness-for-Christ Culture is an important part of Russian religious culture; its inherent dual character of ＂Madness and piety＂—affirmation of eternal salvation and negation of secular power—affected the ＂affirmative＂ and ＂negative＂ content of the Russian literature; meanwhile, it played a structural role in the literary forms, such as the delay processing of aesthetic satisfaction, the sarcasm of self-reference, aswellasthe grand narrativestyle in micro-narration. Thewritersgroupsaretheintermediaries of Foolishness-for-Christ Culture that impacts Russian literature. Therefore, the study of these complex relationships will better explore the universal significance and aesthetic value ofRussian literatureclassic, and provide areferencesystem forbuildingChinese localculture. |
| |
| Keywords: | foolishness-for-Christ culture Russian literature Russian national character madness and piety |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
