| 异质性社会资本对互联网众筹绩效的影响研究——以“众筹网”为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘征驰,周莎,马滔.异质性社会资本对互联网众筹绩效的影响研究——以“众筹网”为例[J].科研管理,2019,40(7):206-214. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘征驰 周莎 马滔 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南大学经济与贸易学院,湖南长沙,410082;湖南大学经济与贸易学院,湖南长沙,410082;湖南大学经济与贸易学院,湖南长沙,410082 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金国际合作项目（71420107027，起止时间：2015.01-2018.12）；湖南省自然科学基金面上项目（2017JJ2037，起止时间：2017.01-2019.12）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（71771081，起止时间2018.01-2021.12）。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 互联网众筹可视为一种大众参与和共同创造的新兴创业孵化范式。本文基于社会资本理论，构建了异质性社会资本影响互联网众筹绩效的理论模型。特别的，注意到发起人两种不同的社会资本，即“社交资本”和“社群资本”，分别具有“对人不对事”和“对事不对人”的特质，因而在众筹事前风险甄别和事后监督惩罚中具有不同作用机理。最后，采集“众筹网”微观数据对理论假设进行检验。研究结果表明：1）发起人的社群资本和社交资本均对众筹绩效有正向影响；2）相对于社交资本，发起人的社群资本对众筹绩效的影响更加显著。
|
| 关 键 词： | 互联网众筹 社会资本 信息不对称 社群 |
| 收稿时间： | 2016-06-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2018-05-14 |
A research on the impact of heterogeneous social capitals on crowdfunding performance by taking “www.zhongchou.cn” as an example |
| |
| Liu Zhengchi,Zhou Sha,Ma Tao.A research on the impact of heterogeneous social capitals on crowdfunding performance by taking “www.zhongchou.cn” as an example[J].Science Research Management,2019,40(7):206-214. |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Zhengchi Zhou Sha Ma Tao |
| |
| Institution: | School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Internet-based crowdfunding has been regarded as the new mechanism of incubating creative programs which involves mass participation and value co-creation, and how to optimize the financing performance has always been an important topic in the field of crowdfunding. Although a few scholars have discussed the interaction between social capital and crowdfunding performance, there is still no systematic research on the effects of heterogeneous social capital on crowdfunding performance. In fact, there are differences in governance mechanisms between internal and external social capital of crowdfunding platforms, so it is necessary to treat them differently.
Firstly, this paper defines the concept of social-network-capital and community capital based on the theory of social capital.While the social-network-capital refers to all kinds of potential resources acquired by initiators from their third-party social networks (e.g. Weixin, Weibo, Facebook, etc.), the community capital refers to all kinds of potential resources acquired by initiators from a decentralized network within crowdfunding platform. Hence, the former is often about the “individual” and the latter is often about the “idea”.
Secondly, three hypotheses are put forward based on information asymmetry theory. From the perspective of governance mechanism, social-network-capital and community capital play different roles in ex-ante screening and ex-post supervision. Specifically, social-network-capital is conducive to identifying the credit types of initiators and supervising the implementation of initiators, while community capital plays a significant role in identifying project risks and punishing project defaults. Because the latter concerns the facts more than the individuals, it has unique advantages in solving the problem of “trust of strangers”. Based on the above theoretical analysis, this paper puts forward three hypotheses as follows:H1, social-network-capital has a positive impact on crowdfunding performance. H2, community capital has a positive impact on crowdfunding performance. H3, comparatively, community capital does better.
At last, the paper empirically identifies the relationship between heterogeneous social capitals and crowdfunding performance by using multiple regression model based on the data collected from the Chines earliest crowdfunding website “www.zhongchou.cn” over the period of 2014-2015 from public financing pages of projects, and the empirical results support all of the hypotheses. To sum up, the main empirical results are shown as follows:(1) two kinds of social capital both are positively correlated with crowdfunding performance, projects with stronger social bonds are more likely to succeed in financing activities. This shows that, in addition to hard information such as financial identity,crowdfunding investors can also obtain informal information of initiators, i.e. soft information, at a lower cost, which provides important references for crowdfunidng investment decision. (2) The effects of two types of social capital on crowdfunding performance is different, and the impact of community capital is more prominent than that of social-network-capital. The initiator and the members of the crowdfunding community are connected by weak links, and the maintenance of the relationship mostly depends on the common goal or interests but not personal favors, that is, they will treat of a matter as a case for discussion without reflection on any particular person. Therefore, the quality signal of projects transmitted by community capital is more trustworthy for investors to participate in decision-making.
The contributions of this paper are twofold. At first, there are many international literature studying the influence factors of crowdfunding performance and a few paper studying the correlation between the social capital and crowdfunding outcome. However, little attention has been paid to the different governance mechanism of heterogeneous social capital. This paper considers two types of social capital, one is embedded in initiators’ personal social network which is usually formed by “strong ties”, the other is embedded in a professional and decentralized social network which is usually form by “weak ties”. Second, it is found that the feature of “focus on the case but not the person” leads community capital performs better in screening risk and supervising agent. This finding is the most important theoretical contribution of this study.
This paper also provides advice on enterprise management and policy implementation for different types of participants of crowdfunding markets. The paper argues that the initiator should pay more attention to the development of personal social network, promote the accumulation of social capital, and improve the utilization rate of social network. Crowdfunding platforms should improve the project review processes and strictly fulfill the obligation of due diligence, more important, guiding the establishment of professional communities. The implementation of government policy should focus on strengthen the protection of crowdfunding investors and provide more ideas and technical guidance. |
| |
| Keywords: | Internet-based crowdfunding social capital information asymmetry community |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
