Black and white transparency: contradictions of a moral metaphor |
| |
| Authors: | Armando Menéndez-Viso |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad de Oviedo, c/Teniente Alfonso Martínez, s/n, 33011 Oviedo, Spain |
| |
| Abstract: | Transparency has evolved from an individual, dangerous power in Plato to a desirable, collective property in the contemporary world. This paper intends to give a brief account of this long and somehow surprising path and extract some interesting consequences for economic and political activities, as well as for information technologies. Six literary masterpieces are used to highlight the contradictions and dangers entailed by the abuse of the fascinating metaphor of transparency. In the end, what is usually intended when demanding transparency from a corporation, a firm or a state is more (or more accessible) information about it, i.e., understandable and abundant black and white data. This means reporting, picturing, producing material, becoming apparent, which is precisely the contrary of being transparent. We don’t want to look through, but to look directly at. The question, then, is not transparency, but opacity: what do we need and want to see, and how is this going to be produced? |
| |
| Keywords: | Corporate social responsibility Ethics Information Transparency Visibility |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
