首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

甘肃永昌"罗马城"质疑
引用本文:何立波.甘肃永昌"罗马城"质疑[J].周口师范学院学报,2002,19(6):70-73.
作者姓名:何立波
作者单位:解放军装甲兵工程学院,文史教研室,北京,100072
摘    要:近年来,有关甘肃永昌县发现“罗马城”的报道接连不断,而这实际上并不存在。从西方古典文献来看,克拉苏之子及罗马远征军残部的下落均有明确的记载,且罗马没有木城,罗马军团的乌龟阵也不是什么“鱼鳞阵”;从中国古代典籍来看,陈汤所获的百余名战俘并不是什么“罗马战俘”,而是北匈奴人,且已分给西域15国,并没有带回。

关 键 词:甘肃永昌县  西汉  罗马城  罗马战俘  陈汤  木城  罗马远征军  克拉苏
文章编号:1671-9476(2002)06-0070-04
修稿时间:2002年3月14日

Query of "Roman City" in Yongchang of Gansu Province
HE Li,bo.Query of "Roman City" in Yongchang of Gansu Province[J].Journal of Zhoukou Normal University,2002,19(6):70-73.
Authors:HE Li  bo
Abstract:In recent years, Chinese newspapers and foreign newspapers have frequently reported the news that "Roman City" had been discovered in Gasu province. However, there were not "Roman war captures" and" Roman City ".According to west classical data, publius, namely the son of Crassus, had died in kare War.The remnant army had come back to Rome in the lead of duty general of Crassus thorough Syrian. There were not trees cities in Rome.The tortoise array was not "Fish Scale Array". According to Chinese ancient data, more than one hundred war captives that Chen Tang captured were not" Roman war captures", but Beixiongnu men ,which had been delivered to fiffteen countries of Xiyu and had not been taken back.
Keywords:Roman City  Roman war captures  Crassus  Chen Tang  trees cities
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号