| 论刑事诉讼中的“举证责任”——我国与英美法系国家“举证责任”理论之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孟莉.论刑事诉讼中的“举证责任”——我国与英美法系国家“举证责任”理论之比较[J].新乡师范高等专科学校学报,2004,18(3):33-34. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孟莉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 平原大学,社科部,河南,新乡,453003 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于诉讼模式和历史习惯的差异,各国法学家关于"举证责任"的观点大相径庭。通过从实体和程序两个方面对我国和英美法系国家的"举证责任"的理论进行比较,力图对我国"举证责任"的理论和立法技术起到借鉴作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 举证责任 英美法系 举证责任分配 主观举证责任 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7613(2004)03-0033-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年12月20 |
On Evidential Burden In Criminal Charge--A Comparison between the view of our country and that of Anglo-American law system countries on evidential burden |
| |
| MENG Li.On Evidential Burden In Criminal Charge--A Comparison between the view of our country and that of Anglo-American law system countries on evidential burden[J].Journal of Xinxiang Teachers College,2004,18(3):33-34. |
| |
| Authors: | MENG Li |
| |
| Abstract: | The jurists in each country regard evident burden different from each other because of the difference of their action mode and historical habits. This author tries to compare the theory of on evidential burden between our country and Anglo-American law system countries from two aspects of substance and procedure, in order to be made use of by our country in the theory of evidential and legislative technique. |
| |
| Keywords: | evidential burden Anglo-American law system assignation of evidential burden subjective evidential burden |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
