| 明代皇帝的修省与罪己 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李媛.明代皇帝的修省与罪己[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010(1):55-61. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李媛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 东北师范大学历史文化学院,吉林长春130024 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目“十五至十九世纪世界变迁中的中国社会发展模式研究”（09BZS004）,项目负责人：赵轶峰. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 明朝皇帝的修省活动较以往历代更为频繁，成化以后表现尤其明显，已经发展成为一种常规化的政策反思手段。皇帝修省包括因自然灾害或天象异常而进行的消极的应对式修省，以及日常化的、为主动求过进行的积极式修省，修省范围只限于干天合之事，并不为人事而举。当修省不足以显示反思之诚意时，即颁布罪己诏书，这是皇帝反思活动的极致表现。明朝皇帝的修省和罪已行为反映了儒家圣王之责任担当的意义，具有弥祸、祈庥的宗教意味，也是安抚臣民、调整政策的承诺。明朝皇帝和士大夫对待修省行为的态度体现出帝制体系内君主与士大夫政治角色、理念之间的契合之处。修省与罪己作为一种内在的反省机制，对君德、君责的履行提出了要求和保障，使君主之行为具有极限，但这种对君权的限制仍相当朦胧。
|
| 关 键 词： | 修省 罪己 明代 皇帝 儒家 |
The Critical Meditation and Self-blaming Decrees of the Ming Emperors |
| |
| LI Yuan.The Critical Meditation and Self-blaming Decrees of the Ming Emperors[J].Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition),2010(1):55-61. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Yuan |
| |
| Institution: | LI Yuan (School of History and Culture, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The Ming emperors conducted critical meditation and issued self-blaming decrees more frequently than the emperors of the previous dynasties. Especially after Chenghua （1465--1488） period, it had become a routine method of policy introspection and adjustment. The direct reasons for holding critical meditation might be natural calamity, abnormal astronomical phenomena such passive things, or, even simply for active self-cultivation. In most cases, critical meditations were held for natural or astronomical events, rarely for social issues. When an issue was so serious that can not be dealt with by holding critical meditation, the emperor would issue a self-blaming decree to assume responsibility, which was the extreme conduct that an emperor would do in such situations. The emperors＇ critical meditation and self-blaming decrees reflect Confucian consciousness of monarchy responsibility. They were expected to have the religious function of eliminating disaster and blessing. In addition, they represented the promises of the emperors to people for better policies. In a close examination of the attitudes of the Ming emperors and the scholar officials to the above mentioned issues, the compatibility between emperors and scholar officials in terms of political roles and stand is embodied. As internal intro- spection processes, the critical meditation and the issuing of self-blaming decrees constituted a common expectation and protection of the virtue and responsibility of the emperors, which limited the behaviors of the emperors, although the limitation was in itself limited. |
| |
| Keywords: | critical meditation self-blaming decrees the Ming Dynasty Emperors the Confucianists |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
