首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

关于批判性思维的批判的批判——与王路教授商榷
引用本文:马佩.关于批判性思维的批判的批判——与王路教授商榷[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010(4):54-58.
作者姓名:马佩
作者单位:河南大学人文社科研究中心,河南开封475001
摘    要:"王文"以数理逻辑否定普通逻辑、批判性思维逻辑、非形式逻辑是以小逻辑观否定大逻辑观;"王文"混淆传统逻辑与普通逻辑,混淆数理逻辑与现代逻辑,其"以数理逻辑完全取代普通逻辑"的错误主张偷换为冠冕堂皇的"以现代逻辑取代传统逻辑"的口号;绝对不能以数理逻辑取代普通逻辑,"王文"所提出的以数理逻辑取代普通逻辑的种种理由都是不能成立的。

关 键 词:逻辑观  普通逻辑  批判性思维  非形式逻辑  数理逻辑

Re-Criticism to the Criticism of Critical Thinking - A Discussion with Professor Wang Lu
MA Pei.Re-Criticism to the Criticism of Critical Thinking - A Discussion with Professor Wang Lu[J].Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition),2010(4):54-58.
Authors:MA Pei
Institution:MA Pei (Center o j Humanities and Social Sciences, Henan University, Kai feng 475001, China)
Abstract:Through denying ordinary Logic, critical thinking Logic and informal Logic, Professor Wang replaces the wide viewpoint of Logic with a narrow one in his paper. Confused in dealing with traditional Logic and ordinary Logic, mathematical Logic and Modern Logic, Professor Wang substitutes stealthily the high sounding slogan "substituting modern Logic for traditional Logic" for the wrong opinion "substituting mathematical I.ogic for ordinary Logic absolutely". It is absolutely wrong to substitute mathematical Logic for ordinary Logic, and none of the accounts for substituting mathematical Logic for ordinary Logic served in Professor Wang's paper is reasonable.
Keywords:viewpoint of Logic  ordinary Logic  critical thinking  informal Logic  mathematical Logic
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号