| 论法律实证主义 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈锐.论法律实证主义[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,32(1):109-113. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈锐 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学,重庆,400031 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法律实证主义是西方的重要法学流派,同时又是一个饱受误解的学派。本文首先探讨了法律实证主义的定义问题,认为,法律实证主义是一个家族相似的流派。接着．讨论了法律实证主义思想的中心地带——“分离理论”和“社会事实理论”．力图消除人们对它的误解。随后重点研究了对法律实证主义的批判,对这些批判分别加以驳斥和辩护。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律实证主义 温和的法律实证主义 排他的法律实证主义 分离理论 社会事实理论 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-2359(2005)01-0109-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年9月8日 |
On Legal Positivism |
| |
| CHEN Rui.On Legal Positivism[J].Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2005,32(1):109-113. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Rui |
| |
| Abstract: | Legal positivism is an important legal school in western history of law, which plays a great role in the development of western legal thoughts. At the same time, legal positivism receives so many criticisms that people misunderstands it. In order to understand it correctly, this article firstly compares it with other similar concepts. Then this article focuses on the key topic of legal positivism: " separation thesis" and "social fact thesis". On the basis of them, this article defends for legal positivism. In the end,this article discusses the role of legal positivism in China and our suitable attitude to it. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal positivism exclusive legal positivism inclusive legal positivism separation thesis social fact thesis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
