| 《文选》与胡克家《考异》校议(下) |
| |
| 引用本文： | 方向东.《文选》与胡克家《考异》校议(下)[J].南京师范大学文学院学报,2002(4):174-182. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 方向东 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学,文学院,南京,210097 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《选》李善注和胡克家《考异》堪称《选》双璧，然日藏唐钞《＜选＞集注》问世，发现正、注与《考异》多有失当之处，于是逐句校勘，得校议260余条，供学界参考。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《文选》 《考异》 校议 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-9853(2002)04-174-09 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年5月27日 |
Literary Selections and Emendation of Hu Kejia's Diverged Textual Criticism |
| |
| Fang Xiangdong.Literary Selections and Emendation of Hu Kejia''''s Diverged Textual Criticism[J].Journal of Chinese Language and Culture School Nanjing Normal University,2002(4):174-182. |
| |
| Authors: | Fang Xiangdong |
| |
| Institution: | Fang Xiangdong |
| |
| Abstract: | Li Shan's annotated Literary Selections and Hu Kejia's Diverged Textual Criticism may well be called the Gemini of Literary Selections. But after a Japanese-collected Tang version of the Annotated Literary Selections is published, we find quite a few improprieties between the text, its annotations and Hu's Diverged Textual Criticism. Thus a sentence-for-sentence collation is done, which results in over 260 emendations. They might be used for reference by the academic circles. |
| |
| Keywords: | Literary Selections Diverged Textual Criticism emendation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
