| FAIR数据评估模型与工具研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 叶兰.FAIR数据评估模型与工具研究[J].图书情报工作,2021,65(16):138-147. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 叶兰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 深圳大学图书馆 深圳 518060 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文系教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"基于成熟度视角的高校图书馆科学数据管理服务能力评价研究"（项目编号：19YJC870028）研究成果之一。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的/意义] 对比分析FAIR数据评估模型与工具，为数据建设和数据管理过程中利益相关者评估FAIR数据的遵循度提供参考。方法/过程] 通过文献综述及模型文本的研究，从评估指标和评估方法两方面介绍国际上7个评估FAIR数据遵循度的指标模型与工具，采用比较分析法从评估方法的类型、评估方法的自动化程度、评估方法的可操作性、指标数量与分布、元数据指标设置、指标清晰度等6个方面对比分析各模型与工具。结果/结论] 基于对比与评析结果，为选择与应用FAIR数据评估模型与工具提出"FAIRsFAIR数据对象评估+FAIR数据成熟度模型"的方案。
|
| 关 键 词： | FAIR评估 FAIR遵循度 FAIR成熟度 FAIR指标 数据FAIR化 FAIR原则 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-12-29 |
| 修稿时间： | 2021-03-18 |
Research on FAIR Data Assessment Models and Tools |
| |
| Ye Lan.Research on FAIR Data Assessment Models and Tools[J].Library and Information Service,2021,65(16):138-147. |
| |
| Authors: | Ye Lan |
| |
| Institution: | Shenzhen University Library, Shenzhen 518060 |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose/significance] This paper compares the main FAIR assessment models and tools in order to provide references for stakeholders in data management to assess data FAIRness.Method/process] The metrics and the evaluation methods of each model or tool were introduced through a literature review and content analysis. The comparative analysis method was also used to evaluate FAIR assessment models and tools from 6 aspects, including types, automation, operability of FAIRness evaluation method, number and distribution of indicators, metadata indicator settings, and indicator clarity.Result/conclusion] Based on the comparison of each model or tool, a solution of "FAIRsFAIR Data Object Assessment Metrics + RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model" is proposed for stakeholdersin data management in selecting and application of FAIR assessment models. |
| |
| Keywords: | FAIR assessments dataFAIRness FAIR maturity FAIR metrics data FAIRification FAIR principles |
|
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
