| 评析医疗事故技术鉴定的“2+1”模式 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李晓郛.评析医疗事故技术鉴定的“2+1”模式[J].四川职业技术学院学报,2011,21(1):20-22. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李晓郛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学,上海,长宁,200042 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 今年7月开始实施的《侵权责任法》放弃使用"医疗事故"概念,因为从2002年开始实行的医疗事故技术鉴定"2+1"模式已经出现了不少缺陷:"集体鉴定"制度与鉴定结论的证据属性不符;鉴定中回避主体范围比较狭窄,申请回避的提出时间不明确;医疗事故技术鉴定的管辖权不明,而许多地方已经开始施行异地鉴定;行政审查鉴定申请的做法不合理;中华医学会启动鉴定的具体标准和前置程序并未确定;实践中对待各级鉴定的效力做法与法理不符。希望相关部门尽快出台规定或者解释,以符合新法的原则和要求。
|
| 关 键 词： | “2+1”模式 医疗事故 技术鉴定 |
Analysis on the"2+1"Mode in Technical Appraisement for the Medical Negligence |
| |
| LI Xiaofu.Analysis on the"2+1"Mode in Technical Appraisement for the Medical Negligence[J].Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College,2011,21(1):20-22. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Xiaofu |
| |
| Institution: | LI Xiaofu(East China University of Political Science and Law,Changning Shanghai,200042) |
| |
| Abstract: | Tort Liability Law implements in July,which drops use of medical negligence since the 2+1mode has emerged shortcomings from 2002.Collective appraisal system violates the nature of identification of evidence.The scope of application of withdrawal is narrow and the proposed time to apply for withdrawal is not clear.Medical malpractice jurisdiction is unknown while many places have already begun to implement a remote identification.It is unreasonable that the application should be viewed by administrative orga... |
| |
| Keywords: | 2 1Mode Medical Negligence Technical Appraisement |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
