| 试论啖、赵《春秋》学派的学术贡献 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高明峰.试论啖、赵《春秋》学派的学术贡献[J].宜宾学院学报,2007,7(9):4-9. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高明峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 辽宁师范大学,文学院,辽宁,大连,116029 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文着重探讨了啖助、赵匡、陆质(淳)等人的《春秋》学派的学术贡献,认为其学说特别值得注意的有两个方面:一是在学风上舍传求经、会通三传;二是在内容上关于《春秋》的主旨以及三传的得失的阐释.其贡献则不仅在活跃学术思想,推动舍传求经的风气,而且具有经学的示范意义,促使人们思考怎样进一步阐发“微言“,复兴儒道.
|
| 关 键 词： | 啖助 赵匡 《春秋》学派 舍传求经 复兴儒道 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-5365(2007)09-0004-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年4月17日 |
On Dan Zhu and Zhao Kuang's Academic Contribution of School of Spring and Autumn Annals |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Ming-feng |
| |
| Abstract: | The focal point of this article is to discuss on Dan Zhu,Zhao Kuang and Lu Zhi(Chun)'s academic contribution of school of Spring and Autumn Annals.Their thought have two aspects considered more.First,in the academic discipline,they ignore the commentaries on classics and focus on the Confucian classics.Also,they achieve thorough understanding through three commentaries of Spring and Autumn Annals.Second,in the content,they have their own explaining of the purport of Spring and Autumn Annals and the success and failure of the three commentaries of Spring and Autumn Annals.The contribution is not only on enlivening the learning thought and pushing the atmosphere of ignoring the commentaries on classics,but also on setting an example for the classics study,this forces people to think how to demonstrate sublime words and revival the Confucian scholar. |
| |
| Keywords: | Dan Zhu Zhao Kuang School of Spring and Autumn Annals Ignoring the Commentaries on Classics and Focusing on the Confucian Classics Revival of the Confucian Scholar |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
