|
|||||
|
|
| 反兴奋剂的法理研究 | |
| 引用本文： | 谢雪峰,ZHANG Hou-fu,王晶,刘丹里,熊银.反兴奋剂的法理研究[J].武汉体育学院学报,2008,42(7):5. |
| 作者姓名： | 谢雪峰 ZHANG Hou-fu 王晶 刘丹里 熊银 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 武汉体育学院,高等教育研究所,湖北,武汉,430079 2. 湖北轻工职业技术学院,体育部,湖北,武汉,430070 |
| 基金项目： | 国家体育总局体育社会科学研究项目 |
| 摘 要： | 反兴奋剂司法中，“程序正义与实质正义”的取舍中，优先维护程序正义；“公平与效率”出现矛盾时，效率先于公平；“严格责任与过错责任”则分别适于“定罪”和“量型”；面对“行为能力是否具备”，目前是“对象一律”的策略，以后应立法加以改进。反兴奋剂执法中法律救济贯彻正义、公平理念，彰显人文关怀。反兴奋剂教育工作是反兴奋剂法理实践的自觉前移，彰显教育先于惩治、预防重于惩治的人文精神。我国应完善正式教育体系，将教育对象从运动员、管理人员扩大到各类社会人员，尤其是体育专业学生及其生源。反兴奋剂斗争是“体育精神与负面人性的博弈”，而科技的发展给新类型和新品种兴奋剂出现带来可能，因而反兴奋剂具有复杂性、长期性。 |
| 关 键 词： | 体育法学 兴奋剂 反兴奋剂立法 体育竞赛公平 “穷举法” 法理 |
Legal study of anti-doping |
|
| Abstract: | In anti-doping jurisdiction ,the selection of procedural justice and substantial justice ,should give priority to procedural justice. When there are cont radictions in justice and efficiency , efficiency is more important than justice. St rict responsibility and fault responsibility are adopted separately to conviction and punishment . The law is the same to all the object s in whether they are legal capable or not ,which needs to be improved. Legal assistance plays a special role in anti2doping jurisdiction. It can advocate justice and humanistic concern. Anti2doping education can display the spirit that education comes before punishment and prevention comes before punishment . In China ,not only the athlete ,but all the people in the society should be educated as to knowledge of anti2doping. Anti2doping has to undergo a long way because it is a game between sport s spirit and negative human nature. |
| Keywords: | excitant excitant use anti-excitant legislation fair play of sport s competition Exhaustionmethod spirit of law |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 | |