首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

优化“一带一路”国际科技合作项目评审专家人数的探究
引用本文:贠涛,张金倩楠,李姗姗,赵新力.优化“一带一路”国际科技合作项目评审专家人数的探究[J].科技管理研究,2021,41(15):52-57.
作者姓名:贠涛  张金倩楠  李姗姗  赵新力
作者单位:中国科学技术交流中心,北京100045;中国科学技术交流中心,北京100045;清华大学中国科技政策研究中心,北京 100084
基金项目:国家社科基金一般项目“‘一带一路’倡议实施中的科技开放合作重点与难点研究”
摘    要:同行评审作为科研项目评审立项过程中的核心环节,广泛地应用于中国各级科研计划的管理过程.但是,在"一带一路"国际科技合作项目的 评审环节,仍然存在着评审效率较低的问题,表现为项目评审周期较长和评审费用支出较高的问题.研究以"一带一路"国际科技合作项目投票打分情况为数据来源,利用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数整体定量衡量不同专家数量组合对同行评审的影响,并定量给出影响的特征值.据此进一步提出优化"一带一路"国际科技合作项目专家评审效率的建议.

关 键 词:同行评审  一带一路  斯皮尔曼等级相关系数  科研管理  国际合作  科学技术
收稿时间:2021/4/26 0:00:00
修稿时间:2021/7/2 0:00:00

Research on Optimizing the Number of Experts in Reviewing "Belt and Road" International Science and Technology Cooperation Project
Yun Tao,Zhang Jinqiannan,Li Shanshan,Zhao Xinli.Research on Optimizing the Number of Experts in Reviewing "Belt and Road" International Science and Technology Cooperation Project[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2021,41(15):52-57.
Authors:Yun Tao  Zhang Jinqiannan  Li Shanshan  Zhao Xinli
Abstract:Peer review, as the core mean in the process of scientific research project review and approval, is widely used in the management process at all levels in China. However, in the process of project review on "Belt and Road" International Science and Technology Cooperation Project, there are still problems of low efficiency, such as long project review cycle and high cost. This work studies the disputes employing spearman correlation on voting score of , giving the characteristic value of the influence of certain number of review experts. The numerical results suggest show that the number of evaluation experts still has the potential to be further optimized.
Keywords:Peer Review  Belt and Road  Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient  Scientific Research Management  International Co-operation  Science and Technology  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号