| 从庭前固定事实主张的角度评析举证时限制度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张家波.从庭前固定事实主张的角度评析举证时限制度[J].德州学院学报,2014(3):46-51. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张家波 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学法律系,上海200000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国举证时限制度经历了逐步淡化职权主义色彩而吸收当事人主义理念的立法演变,当事人举证能力和提出证据的积极性有了很大程度的提高,但也产生了诸如当事人滥用诉讼权利等问题。故,新《民事诉讼法》又重新寄希望于法院能通过其职权来发挥举证时限制度的作用。之所以出现这种立法反复,是因为我国举证时限制度在立法上的调整始终围绕着证据展开,而对于事实主张的明确并没有做出规定,使得当事人证据的收集和交换没有目的性,所以有必要在立法上规定庭前明确事实主张,并辅之以相应的制度保障。
|
| 关 键 词： | 事实主张 举证时限制度 制度构建 |
Comment the System of Time Limit of Proof from the Angle of Pretrial Fixed Facts Advocate |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Jia-- bo (Law Department, East China University of Politics and Law, Shanghai 200000, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Our proof limit system experienced the fading of inquisitorial factors while absorbing adversary factors,litigating ability and enthusiasm have made a great improvement in the level of evidence, but also produced such as party litigation rights abuse and other issues. So the new ＂Civil Procedure Law＂ hoped that the court again to play a role of the system of time limit of proof by its terms. The reason of legislation repetiton is that the legislative adjustment of the system of time limit of proof is always around the evi- dence,without clear advocates of fact ,resulted in evidence collection and exchange of the parties no purpose. So, it＇s necessary to clear facts advocate pretrial and complemented by appropriate institutional guarantees. |
| |
| Keywords: | facts advocate the system of time limit of proof system construction |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
