| 笑谈古今也从容——试论“戏说历史”的文化内涵 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 季广茂.笑谈古今也从容——试论“戏说历史”的文化内涵[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005(4):45-49. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 季广茂 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京师范大学,文艺学研究中心,北京,100875 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部跨世纪优秀人才培养计划 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 任何一种历史记录都带有某种程度的主观性,任何人都不具有界定、说明、解释历史事实的终极权力。不同的历史观和历史记录掩藏着不同的旨趣,对历史题材的处理遮蔽着不同的利益。“戏说”历史可分为两类:一类是以戏剧的形式述说历史,一类是以游戏的心态述说历史。一般社会精英易于容忍前者,却难以接受后者;而在普通百姓那里,这种区分没有多少实质意义。并非所有的“戏说历史”都是合理合法或有价值的,但探索总是应该允许的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 历史观 历史剧 历史题材 戏说历史 历史编纂 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-0209（2005）04-0045-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-03-17 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-03-17 |
The Cultural Implication of "Jesting" History |
| |
| JI Guang-mao.The Cultural Implication of "Jesting" History[J].Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Science Edition),2005(4):45-49. |
| |
| Authors: | JI Guang-mao |
| |
| Abstract: | Subjectivity is more or less inescapable in any historical works and nobody has the final say of defining, explai- ning and interpreting historical events. To be specific, different historical outlooks or records conceive different purports and hence different interests in dealing with historical themes. With this principle in mind, "jesting" history may be divided into two sorts: one being shaped in dramatic form and the other resulting from game psychology. Academic figures are likely to accept the former but unbearable for the latter; for the populace, however, the distinction makes little difference. Generally, not all "jesting" historical works are close to historical facts or valuable, but alternative explorations are allowable. |
| |
| Keywords: | outlook of history historical play historical subject matter jesting history historiography |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
