| 刑法没收对象之探讨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 冉小璐,赵增田.刑法没收对象之探讨[J].嘉应学院学报,2011,29(4):54-58. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 冉小璐 赵增田 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 山东汇海律师事务所,山东,青岛,266071
2. 上海市宝山区人民检察院,上海,200240 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国刑法对没收对象没有作出明确的规定,实践中使用的涉案财产的概念模糊而导致侦查机关任意扩大扣押的范围,易于对当事人财产权利造成侵害。本文在借鉴有关国家和地区的立法经验和理论研究的基础上,提出刑法没收的对象应从犯罪工具、犯罪所得和违禁品以三个方面予以具体化界定,并对三类涉案财物的内涵、外延及其划定时存在的问题进行了探讨。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事没收 犯罪工具 犯罪所得 违禁品 |
Analysis about the Objects of Criminal Confiscation |
| |
| RAN Xiao-lu,ZHAO Zeng-tian.Analysis about the Objects of Criminal Confiscation[J].Journal of Jiaying University,2011,29(4):54-58. |
| |
| Authors: | RAN Xiao-lu ZHAO Zeng-tian |
| |
| Institution: | RAN Xiao-lu1,ZHAO Zeng-tian2(1.Shandong Huihai Law Firm,Qingdao 266071,China,2.People's Prosecution of Baoshan District,Shanghai 200240,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Because the confiscation objects are not clearly prescribed in our criminal law,investigative organization can expand the scope of seizure arbitrarily and easily do harm to the property rights of the criminals.This article proposes confiscation objects be clearly divided into instrument of crime,crime gains and contraband,and analyzes the connotation and the problems existing in the above involved property based on a study of relevant countries and regions' legislation and doctrines. |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal confiscation instrument of crime crime gains contraband |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
